PrepTest 151

[lcid:3701] Prep Test 151 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S2 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Economist: If minimum wage Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Strengthen Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Productivity growth in a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Strengthen

    Stimulus Summary:
    If minimum wage is low, companies hire people instead of buying machines, and productivity growth slows. Productivity growth is necessary for higher average standards of living. Higher minimum wage leads to higher productivity. So, a raise to the minimum wage will improve overall economic health (productivity will balance out loss in job growth).

    Answer Anticipation:
    This argument draws a conclusion about overall economic health, but it never defines what factors are important or determinative to overall economic health. It does, however, list a few that are important factors—productivity (which is related to avg. standard of living) and employment levels. The balance between these two is important for the author's conclusion—productivity, to her, trumps the rise in unemployment (or, at least, lower levels of new hiring). Any answer that bolsters that balance strengthens the argument.

    Answer Explanation:
    Right off the bat, this answer helps the author's argument. She balances the positives (increased productivity) with the negatives (decreased hiring), and determines that the positives outweigh the negatives. If this answer is true, then the negative will also eventually go away, or at least abate, making the balance even more likely to be in favor of increasing minimum wage.

    Key Takeaway:
    When an argument balances the pros and cons of a course of action, correct answers will frequently deal with the relative value of the pros and cons. Look for any answer that would play into the determination of whether the pros outweigh the cons.
  2. B
    The economist's country has Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. An argument could be made that a country with increasing unemployment shouldn't take an action that will lower hiring, such as the author suggests here.
  3. C
    A country's unemployment rate Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer doesn't give information about how unemployment and average standard of living are related, just that they are. Maybe having a certain level of unemployment is important to having the highest standard of living (reflecting people who are between jobs by choice). Answers that are open to interpretation like this are rarely correct in Strengthen or Weaken questions.
  4. D
    The economist's country currently Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. The argument mentions the purchase of productivity-enhancing technology, not the development of new technology. This answer is out of scope.
  5. E
    Productivity-enhancing new technology tends Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. The author wants to raise the minimum wage, thus leading to the adoption of productivity-enhancing technology. If anything, this technology becoming outdated quickly would suggest it might not be the best idea to do anything to lead to its adoption.

What this tests

Discussion