PrepTest 154
[lcid:3712] Prep Test 154 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Rhett: Otto gives me
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Point at Issue Questions
Answer choices
-
AOtto requires Rhett to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. Rhett states that Otto expects Otto to pay, and Barbara doesn't speak to the specific situation between Rhett and Otto at all, so this answer is out of scope. -
BRhett should have to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument/Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed/Valid
Question Type:
Point at Issue
Stimulus Summary:
R: Picking me up doesn't cost Otto anything, so I shouldn't have to pay him for gas.
B: By that logic, you're entitled to unused hot air in my house if you can get it without costing me anything.
Answer Anticipation:
Barbara's response to Rhett is a classic method of reasoning—a reductio ad absurdum, or using his logic to reach an absurd conclusion, highlighting that this argument isn't a good one. By rebutting the "flawed logic" of Rhett's argument and showing that his conclusion is absurd, Barbara commits to believing that Rhett's conclusion is wrong and he should pay Otto for gas. Which is good news, because, otherwise, they don't have any overlap in the actual content of their arguments!
Answer Explanation:
Rhett's conclusion is that he shouldn't have to help pay for Otto's gas. Barbara, in rebutting his argument by pointing out how flawed it is, is committed to believing that he should. This is the point at issue between them.
Key Takeaway:
Pointing out an analogous situation that leads to an absurd conclusion—rebutting an argument with a reductio ad absurdum—doesn't create a lot of overlap between the initial argument and the rebuttal. In a Point at Issue question, that pretty much leaves you with the conclusion of the initial argument as the only potential correct answer. -
Cgiving Rhett a ride Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. Rhett disagrees with this, but Barbara doesn't speak about the situation between Rhett and Otto, so this answer is out of scope. -
DRhett is entitled to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. Rhett doesn't speak to the situation Barbara describes. While Barbara believes that Rhett's logic commits him to that conclusion, it doesn't mean that Rhett himself would agree. -
ERhett could divert to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. Rhett doesn't speak to the situation raised by Barbara, and Barbara raises that as a thought experiment, not something that could be turned into reality.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Started by Masada