Question #4759

Why not A (Circular Logic)

Started by Karen-Norris · started 2022-02-21 04:13 · last activity 2022-03-05 23:02 · 1 reply

Ok, I read the Key Takeaway that in an Errors in Reasoning question that features conditional logic, we should look for a conditional reasoning error unless we're convinced the conditional logic isn't erroneous. I'm hanging my hat on that because when I read the answer explanation: "It concludes that a certain condition (compromise) is necessary for a result (unhappiness) merely from the claim that the condition (again, compromise) leads to that result (unhappiness)." It sure sounds like circular logic to me.

Replies

  1. Emil-Kunkin · 2022-03-05 23:02

    Hi Karen This argument is flawed because it confuses a sufficient condition for a necessary one. A circular argument would be one in which the conclusion was not different from one of the premises (E.g. Since Joel is the best candidate for president, Joel would make the best president out of all the candidates) however, the conclusion here is a misstatement of the premise. Our premise is that If negotiated then unhappy. Our conclusion is that since unhappy, negotiated. This reverses the flow of logic, which is not allowed.

Sign in to reply.