PrepTest 150

[lcid:3699] Prep Test 150 LSAT — Reading Comp — S4 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 15-20 This passage is based on an article written in 1995.  .       Dowsing is the practice of detecting resources Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Background on dowsing
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Definition of "dowsing":
      • The practice of detecting underground resources by walking with an inert object over a terrain (first sentence)
    • Example of dowsing practice:
      • Dowsers find water by walking with a forked tree branch, and when it is pulled into a vertical position, the water is below (second sentence)
      • The distance and flow rate are also determined via the tree branch (third through last sentences)
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to dowsers:
      • Underground water causes the inert object to be "pulled" into a vertical position, with the strength of the pull correlating with the water's flow rate (second and last sentences);(sentence four)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Dowsing skeptics' view
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of arguments against dowsing:
      • The crudeness of the method (first sentence)
      • The dowser is probably subconsciously manipulating the results (second sentence)
      • Numerous studies demonstrate that, though some dowsers demonstrate considerable success, most dowsers are not consistently effective (third sentence three)
      • Dowsers usually only discover water where water was likely to be found anyway (last sentence)
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to skeptics (in contrast to the cause-and-effect relationship in the first paragraph):
      • Skeptics claim the dowser's subconscious thoughts about the likelihood of finding water cause the inert object to be "pulled" upright (second sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Dowsing proponents' view
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of arguments for dowsing:
      • Dowsing is not one skill but multiple techniques that should be evaluated separately (first sentence one)
      • Dowsers are self-certified, and studies of randomly-selected dowsers underrepresent great dowsers (second sentence)
      • Successful dowsers actually notice Earth's electromagnetic fields (third sentence)
      • A good dowser is more effective than scientists using advanced technology (last sentence)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Author: A recent study shows that dowsers may actually be sensitive to electromagnetic fields and more effective than scientists
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • A recent study "corroborated" the dowsing proponents' claims that they may be sensitive to electromagnetic fields and may be more successful than scientists using modern methods (first sentence)
    • Comparison, according to the study:
      • In the study, dowsers made consistently more accurate predictions about the location of drill sites for groundwater than geologists and hydrologists (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "corroborated" (first sentence); "extensive study" (first sentence); "consistently made significantly more accurate predictions" (last sentence); "suggesting" (last sentence)

Main Point: Although many are skeptical of dowsing's efficacy, a recent study has corroborated some dowsing proponents' claims that skilled dowsers are sensitive to changes in Earth's electromagnetic field and are more effective at locating underground water supplies than geologists or hydrologists.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 (P1, S1) - Definition of practice

P2, S1 - Beginning of argument against the practice

P3, S1 - Beginning of argument for the practice

P4, S1 - Author's endorsement of the practice

Meta-Structure?

Resolving a Debate: This author uses a Resolving a Debate Meta-Structure in this passage. In such a passage, the author describes two sides of a debate and then endorses one side or attempts to resolve the dispute. In this case, the author presents a debate over dowsing's efficacy and eventually supports the pro-dowsing position. The passage is organized straightforwardly: the author defines dowsing in the first paragraph, lists arguments against dowsing in the second, outlines the pro-dowsing position in the third, and then gives their final conclusion based on recent evidence in the last paragraph.

The main point in Resolving a Debate Meta-Structures is the author's opinion on the debate or the author's mediation/reconciliation of the debate. In this case, the author's opinion is squarely pro-dowsing. So, we summarized the main point as follows, "Although many are skeptical of dowsing's efficacy, a recent study has corroborated some dowsing proponents' claims that skilled dowsers are sensitive to changes in Earth's electromagnetic field and are more effective at locating underground water supplies than geologists or hydrologists."

List: The predominant minor Meta-Structure in this passage is a list. The author lists arguments for and against dowsing in the second and third paragraphs. We summarized each item on the list in the Passage Summary. We recommend highlighting or underlining each item to help us locate any item we might need to answer a question. But if you'd like to save yourself some fact-finding missions on the inevitable Minor Point questions, you can try to memorize a few key details. Here's what we recommend memorizing about arguments for and against dowsing:

  • Skeptics say dowsing is ineffective, unsupported by studies, and only used when groundwater is likely to be found anyway.
  • Skeptics concede that some dowsers are consistently successful.
  • Proponents say good dowsers may be sensitive to electromagnetic fields and more effective than scientists with modern technology.
  • Proponents concede that there are many more bad dowsers than good dowsers represented in a typical study.

Of course, if you have trouble memorizing stuff, you don't have to. You can always check the passage to anticipate what the correct answer will say. We'll discuss how you can do this most efficiently in the question explanations.

Last Thoughts?

With the lists factoring into each paragraph, this is an exceptionally detail-oriented passage. So, we should expect a higher proportion of Minor Point questions. Thankfully, we'll be armed with location devices even more powerful than a dowsing stick: our notes, what we highlighted/underlined, and (if necessary) the CTRL/Command + F search function.

Question prompt

The author of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Science

Strategy Overview

Consult your notes or passage to recall the author's attitude about the topic in question, and find the answer that best reflects your understanding of the author's opinion on that topic

Answer Anticipation

This question asks us to find the answer choice about the groundwater-locating study in paragraph four that the author would most likely agree with. We can review our notes and what we highlighted/underlined to determine what the correct answer might say.Looking at our notes, we notice that the author provides their opinion on the groundwater-locating study in the fourth paragraph. As our note for that paragraph indicates ("Author: A recent study shows that dowsers may actually be sensitive to electromagnetic fields and more effective than scientists"), the author ultimately concludes that dowsing may be an effective practice. Notably, the author states that the study corroborated the last two of the dowsing proponents' claims — that dowsers may be sensitive to the Earth's electromagnetic field and dowsers have higher success rates than scientists with modern tools do (P3, S3-4; P4, S1). So, the correct answer might say that the author believes that the study shows that dowsers can detect electromagnetic fields or locate groundwater more effectively than some scientists.We should also consider the author's main point when assessing each answer choice. After all, the author wrote the passage to prove the main point — it's the view the author holds with the most conviction, in all likelihood. The correct answer will need to be consistent with the main point. In fact, we may be able to eliminate one or more answer choices because they conflict with the main point.

Answer choices

  1. A
    The results suggest that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice match the author's opinions about the study or the author's main point?

    No, not quite. The study says that dowsing made significantly more accurate predictions than the scientists (P4, S4), but not that the scientists would be of little use. We always need to check whether an answer choice makes a bolder conclusion than the evidence in the passage. Although the author might argue that geologists and hydrologists can be less effective than dowsers, we do not know if the author would agree that these scientists are completely ineffective.

  2. B
    The results leave open Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem

    (B) Does this answer choice match the author's opinions about the study or the author's main point?

    Yes, it does! In fact, this reflects one of the claims the author says the study corroborates — that dowsers may be sensitive to electromagnetic fields (P3, S3-4; P4, S1).

    Some test-takers may hesitate with the phrasing of this answer choice, particularly the phrase "leave open the possibility." These test-takers may feel like this phrase is too weak to capture the author's opinion — if the author concludes that dowsers may be sensitive to electromagnetic fields, why would the author think the results only leave that possibility open?

    Two responses to this understandable concern. First, "leave open the possibility" is not weaker than the author's stated belief. If the results "leave open the possibility" that dowsers sense minute changes in the Earth's electromagnet fields, that just means that dowsers may be able to sense such changes. That matches the author's stated opinion (P4, S4). Second, even if this claim was weaker than the author's stated opinion, we are logically obligated to agree with claims that are weaker than our stated beliefs. For instance, suppose the author believed that most dowsers could sense these minute changes. In that case, the author must also think that at least some dowsers could sense such changes.

  3. C
    The results prove conclusively Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice match the author's opinions about the study or the author's main point?

    Nope. Like answer choice (A), this is way too strong. According to the author, the results of the studies "corroborated" (supported) dowsing proponents' claims that dowsers are sensitive to electromagnetic changes and are more effective at locating groundwater than some scientists (P4, S1). The study didn't "conclusively" prove anything. Moreover, the study only compared dowsers to geologists and hydrologists (P4, S1). The study didn't prove that dowsing is the "most dependable technique" because the study didn't pit dowsing against every other technique for locating water! Remember, we must be cautious when answer choices use superlative language like "the most," "the best," etc.

  4. D
    The results demonstrate that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this answer choice match the author's opinions about the study or the author's main point?

    No, dowsers do not use scientific tools (P1, S1)! So, the study didn't show that dowsers are most successful when using tools typically employed by geologists and hydrologists since the study didn't provide any evidence of dowsers' success when using such tools.

  5. E
    The results do not Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this answer choice match the author's opinions about the study or the author's main point?

    Not quite. Although the study only provides evidence for dowsings' efficacy in arid countries (P4, S1), the author never says that this is one of the study's weaknesses. Additionally, the author never suggests that the results do not refute the dowsing skeptics. When the author expresses opinions on the study, the author only notes that the study supports the dowsing proponents. Therefore, this answer choice does not match the author's attitude.

What this tests

Discussion

  • Why B? 2 replies

    Started by Williamg