PrepTest 148

[lcid:3688] Prep Test 148 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Creating a database of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Cannot Be True Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Most of the duplicates Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. There's no indication of how many plant species have had their DNA already analyzed, so it's possible that most have yet to be done, making this answer possible.
  2. B
    An accurate database of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. While the stimulus notes making one is no easy task, it does seem as if having one would be helpful in preventing duplication and ensuring relationships. This answer is, if anything, supported by the stimulus.
  3. C
    Duplicates and omissions in Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. The stimulus doesn't discuss any other fields, so it's possible that the problem highlighted isn't limited to botany.
  4. D
    Botanists have no techniques Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Facts

    Question Type:
    Cannot Be True

    Stimulus Summary:
    Making a central plant database is hard:

    (1) Scientists have given the same plant different names

    (2) Scientists have been grouping plants from different species wrongly into the same species, as DNA has shown

    Answer Anticipation:
    Cannot Be True questions require answers that contradict information from the stimulus. As such, stronger statements tend to lend themselves to correct answers. Here, however, we just get two issues that have come up with the way that plants have been studied over time. Since these statements more describe a situation than provide strong statements that can be contradicted, we should spend less time anticipating and more time analyzing the answers. And, similarly, let's focus on the stronger ones, as they're more likely to be contradicted.

    Answer Explanation:
    The extreme nature of this answer choice ("no techniques") means that if there's a single technique to allow for determining whether distinct species have distinct names, then this cannot be true and is correct. And since the stimulus notes that botanists have collected and named plants that were already named, there must be some way to tell which plant species have already been named or it would be impossible to know that there have been doubles. So there's at least one technique out there to accomplish this, and this answer is therefore not true.

    Key Takeaway:
    For Cannot Be True questions, extreme answers are more likely to be contradicted and thus correct. Focus on them when analyzing answer choices!
  5. E
    A person who consults Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. The stimulus notes that some plants have received multiple names, so someone looking up just one of them could miss information that's only in a separate entry.

What this tests

Discussion

  • Help 1 reply

    Started by megmcdermott