PrepTest 148

[lcid:3688] Prep Test 148 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

For a species of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Paradox Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Otters and abalones also Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. This might explain why the otters moved in, but the paradox is why, after this predator moved in, abalones evolved to be bigger.
  2. B
    The fossils that were Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. The specific species that evolved is out of scope—all that matters is that they were bigger.
  3. C
    Otters also prey on Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Facts

    Question Type:
    Paradox

    Stimulus Summary:
    General rule Ð Large abalones evolve from small ones when they spend less on hunting/avoiding predators, and more on mating.
    Surprising exception Ð Some large abalones evolved from small ones after otters (a predator) moved in

    Answer Anticipation:
    A general rule is given, and then a situation is raised that seems to run counter to that general rule. In order to resolve this situation, we need to take the information from the situation and make it fit into the general rule.

    That general rule tells us that abalones that evolve into bigger ones—as they did in the scenario—only do so when they spend less energy on hunting/avoiding predators, and more on mating. Therefore, the otters—despite being predators of abalones—must have made it possible for abalones to spend less energy on hunting and avoiding predators, and more on mating. Something about the otters changed the environment in a way that made that possible.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer highlights a change brought about by the otters that conforms to the general rule stated. If the otters preyed on the abalone's food competitors and made it easier for them to get food, then they'd spend less energy on hunting, freeing up energy for mating. This explains how the abalones could evolve to be bigger despite a predator moving in, so it resolves the paradox.

    Key Takeaway:
    In Paradox questions that introduce a general rule, the correct answer should make the situation that seems to "break" that rule actually conform to it.
  4. D
    Small abalone species tend Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. The speed of reproduction isn't mentioned in the stimulus, and it's unclear how it plays into energy utilization or evolution.
  5. E
    Otters have a preference Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. Since the large abalones developed from the small ones "only after" otters moved in, this introduces a whole new paradox.

What this tests

Discussion

  • explanation 1 reply

    Started by GabiKolb