PrepTest 101

[lcid:3503] Prep Test 101 LSAT — Reading Comp — S4 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 15-20  .        When the same habitat types (forests, oceans,  . grasslands, etc.) in regions of different latitudes are Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • "Latitudinal gradient" phenomenon (more species near the equator than poles)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Comparison:
      • When you compare a habitat type that stretches out from the north to the south, there are more species near the equator than far from the equator (first sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "probably even more pronounced" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • "Time theory" hypothesis and author's rebuttal
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the "time theory" hypothesis:
      • Latitudinal gradient exists because tropics haven't been interrupted by ice ages and therefore have more time to develop species (first sentence)
    • Comparison, according to the "time theory" hypothesis:
      • Tropic zones have not been affected by ice ages, while temperate and arctic zones have (first sentence)
    • Author's view:
      • The "time theory" hypothesis isn't consistent with the evidence, as arctic conditions haven't actually been interrupted by ice ages, and there is a varying range of interruption in temperate areas (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "However" (last sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Species-energy hypothesis and author's rebuttal
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the species-energy hypothesis:
      • Latitudinal gradient exists because tropics have more energy from the sun, which causes high biomass and lower rates of extinction (first and last sentences)
    • Author's view:
      • The causal mechanism between biomass and increased local populations remains untested, and biomass and the number of species are not necessarily correlated (second through last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "However" (second sentence); "remains untested" (last sentence)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Climatic-stability hypothesis and author's rebuttal
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the climatic-stability hypothesis:
      • The tropics' stable climate causes a reliable resource supply, which allows more species to coexist (first through third sentences)
    • Author's view
      • The climatic stability hypothesis describes a local process that cannot explain the regional differences along the latitudinal gradient (fourth and last sentences)
    • Example of a local process, according to the author:
      • Competition (last sentence)
    • Example of regional differences along the species gradient, according to the author:
      • Forests along the equator and forces at higher altitudes (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "However" (fourth sentence); "cannot account for" (fourth sentence)

Paragraph 5

  • Paragraph note
    • Rate-of-speciation hypothesis and author's endorsement
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship, according to the rate-of-speciation hypothesis:
      • Latitudinal gradient exists because, in the tropics, the rate of speciation (the development of new species) is higher, and the extinction rate of species is lower (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "most plausible hypothesis" (first sentence)

Paragraph 6

  • Paragraph note
    • How rate of speciation works
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Cause-and-effect relationship/comparisons, according to the rerate-of-speciation hypothesis:
      • Speciation occurs when subgroups become isolated and differentiate from the main population (first and second sentences)
      • Subgroups are more likely to survive in the tropics than in the arctic, causing a higher rate of speciation and a lower rate of extinction in the tropics (third and last sentences)

Main Point: The rate-of-speciation hypothesis is the best explanation for why there exists a latitudinal gradient in species distribution.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 (P1, S1) - Description of phenomenon

P5, S1 - The author's preferred explanation

P6, S4 - How the preferred explanation actually works 

Meta-Structure?

Phenomenon/Explanation: This passage follows a Phenomenon/Explanation Meta-Structure. Passages that utilize this Meta-Structure follow a consistent pattern. First, the passage will describe an observable fact, behavior, or situation. Then, the author will present one or more explanations of that observable fact, behavior, or situation. That's exactly the model this passage follows. The author describes our phenomenon — the latitudinal gradient of species distribution — and then presents four hypotheses that could explain this phenomenon.

In this type of Meta-Structure, if the author says that one explanation is the best, then that's the main point of the passage. Here, the author prefers the last hypothesis, "rate of speciation." So the main point is that the rate-of-speciation hypothesis is the best explanation for why there exists a latitudinal gradient in species distribution. 

Lists: This most prominent minor Meta-Structure in this passage is a list. In fact, nearly the entire passage is dedicated to listing four separate hypotheses for the latitudinal gradient of species distribution. When the whole passage is organized around a list, we'll surely get at least a few questions about items on this list. This is why our notes must allow us to quickly determine which paragraph describes which hypothesis.

Causality: Like many science passages, cause and effect also figure heavily into this passage. Each hypothesis of the latitudinal gradient of species distribution proposes a causal mechanism to explain the phenomenon. For those of us who are less fluent in science than we'd like to be, it can help if we simplify the cause-and-effect relationships as much as possible. We've done so below for each hypothesis:

  • "Time theory": The lack of ice-age disturbance in the tropics is the cause, and more time for species to emerge in the tropics is the effect (P2, S1)
  • Species-energy: Greater energy from the sun is the cause, and more biomass, lower rates of extinction, and more species are the effects (P3, S2)
  • Climatic stability: The tropics' stable climate is the cause, and more resources and species are the effects (P4, S1-3)
  • Rate of speciation: The better chance of surviving in the tropics is the cause, and the lower rates of extinction and higher rates of survival in the tropics are the effects (P6, S4)

Last Thoughts?

The nice thing about this passage is that the middle paragraphs are formulaic. The second, third, and fourth paragraphs follow the same formula: the author describes a hypothesis and then dismisses the hypothesis with counterevidence. Even when the topics (like ecology and species distribution) are unfamiliar, noticing these patterns can help us follow the passage and decoct the structure.

Question prompt

Which one of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Science

Strategy Overview

Review notes on the species-energy hypothesis, if necessary, to anticipate key features of that concept

Answer Anticipation

This question asks us to identify an example that illustrates the species-energy hypothesis. To answer this, we simply have to use our notes or re-read the relevant part of the passage to review the species-energy hypothesis and find the answer choice that presents a new situation that exemplifies the key characteristics of what we reviewed. The correct answer choice will likely present new information, so we shouldn't eliminate anything that seems unfamiliar. We should only eliminate answer choices that do not provide an example of the species-energy hypothesis.Reviewing the third paragraph if necessary, we'll recall that the main idea of the species-energy hypothesis seems to be that the more energy coming from the sun (i.e.. in the tropics), the quicker the rates of growth and reproduction, and in turn the more biomass accumulates (P3, S1). Let's look for an answer choice that exemplifies this pattern.

Answer choices

  1. A
    The many plants in Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice present a situation in which energy from the sun correlates with growth and reproduction rates?

    No. An immediate red flag is that this doesn't present any information about the sun's energy. In fact, some expert test-takers may feel comfortable tabling or eliminating this answer for that reason alone.

    If we dig a little deeper, we'll see this describes a situation where there are many plants but very few species. In other words, this tract features high biomass (the amount of living matter) and few species. The author cites this as counterevidence to undermine the species-energy hypothesis (P3, S3). So, this is inconsistent with part of the species-energy hypothesis.

  2. B
    An animal species experiences Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this answer choice present a situation in which energy from the sun correlates with growth and reproduction rates?

    Nope. Like (A), this doesn't present any information about the sun's energy of the sun. Experienced test-takers may cross this off for that reason alone.

    If we look at (B) more closely, we'd see this presents a case where rapid death is correlated with rapid growth and reproduction. The author describes this possibility as counterevidence against the species-energy hypothesis (P3, S2) since it undermines the theory's assumption that high growth and reproduction rates necessarily result in greater biomass (P3, S1). So, like (A), (B) is inconsistent with part of the species-energy hypothesis.

  3. C
    Within the small number Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice present a situation in which energy from the sun correlates with growth and reproduction rates?

    Not quite. Unlike (A) or (B), this features a desert habit with (presumably) a lot of solar energy. According to the species-energy hypothesis, we should expect high growth and reproduction rates and increased biomass (P3, S1). While this answer choice describes many different species, there's a "small number of living organisms." So, this features a lot of solar energy but low biomass, which is inconsistent with the species-energy hypothesis.

  4. D
    In a tropical rain Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this answer choice present a situation in which energy from the sun correlates with growth and reproduction rates?

    Not really. This describes a tropical rainforest, which will receive much solar energy according to the species-energy hypothesis. So, we'd expect to see high growth and reproduction rates and increased biomass (P3, S1). The species described by (D) has a large population. But according to the species-energy hypothesis, we should see many species with large populations collectively contributing to the region's high biomass. (D) doesn't tell us about any other population. Moreover, the "instances of local extinction" sound like the author's counterevidence against the species-energy hypothesis (P3, S2). So, this answer choice doesn't quite line up with the species-energy hypothesis.

  5. E
    In an arctic tundra, Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem

    (E) Does this answer choice present a situation in which energy from the sun correlates with growth and reproduction rates?

    Finally, yes. But this is tricky. Instead of describing a region with an abundance of sun, (E) describes a paucity of sun. So, we'll have to utilize the inverse of the causal mechanism described by the species-energy hypothesis.

    This describes an arctic tundra, which would be far from the equator and thus be exposed to very little sunlight. As a result, we would expect low growth and reproduction rates and decreased biomass (P3, S1). (E) describes such a situation. The plants and animals in the arctic tundra, which enjoy very little sunlight, have very little growth or reproduction. This is consistent with the species-energy hypothesis, so (E) is our winner.

What this tests

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.