PrepTest 101

[lcid:3503] Prep Test 101 LSAT — Reading Comp — S4 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 9-14  .        Many Native Americans view the archaeological  . excavation and museum display of ancestral skeletal  . remains Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Legal


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • How Native American tribes can establish standing to recover artifacts taken from burial sites
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of the three ways Native Americans can establish standing in cases involving items from burial sites (third sentence):
      • If the plaintiff is the deceased person's heir
      • If the plaintiff owns the land where the burial sites is located
      • If the plaintiff has a clear interest in preserving the burial sites
    • Comparison between the likelihood of establishing standing (fourth sentence):
      • Native Americans are likely to establish standing if the grave is recent and located in an area associated with the plaintiffs; Native Americans are less likely when the grave is ancient and the plaintiffs haven't recently lived in the area where the grave is located
    • Author's view:
      • Common law can provide basis for Native Americans with standing to recover property taken from burial sites (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "less likely to be successful" (fourth sentence); "significant expansion" (fifth sentence); "may provide" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • How Native Americans can use property law to reclaim artifacts from burial sites
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Definition of "abandonment": Legal doctrine that allows the finder of abandoned property to claim ownership of the property (second sentence)
      • Doesn't apply to property from graves, per Charrier v. Bell (third and fourth sentences)
    • Author's view:
      • Artifacts excavated from burial sites should be returned to tribes that can establish standing (last sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • How community property can help Native Americans recover artifacts
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Comparison between individual and communal property:
      • Native American individuals do not have title to communal property owned by the tribe; this communal property cannot be sold by an individual

Main Point: Common law provides a few ways for Native Americans who can establish standing to recover artifacts taken from burial sites.

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 (P1, S1) - Problem described

P2, S4 - Prerequisite for solution discussed

P2, S6 - Author summarizes solution

Meta-Structure?

Problem/Solution: This passage best fits the Problem/Solution Meta-Structure. In such a passage, the author will typically start by describing some problem. In this passage, the problem is the excavation and display of Native American remains and artifacts from ancestral graves. Native Americans view this as "spiritual desecration" (P1, S1). After the problem is identified, the author will typically describe one or more solutions. Here, that solution is using the legal system to recover these excavated artifacts — assuming the Native American claimants can establish "standing" (described at length in "Last Thoughts?" below). The author discusses how property law and the concept of community property can allow some Native American plaintiffs (those bringing the lawsuit to recover the artifacts) to reclaim the artifacts.

The main point in Problem/Solution passages is typically the solution the author describes or endorses. The author summarizes the common law solution in the last sentence of the first paragraph. We can use that sentence when assessing answer choices on the Main Point question or any other question on which we need to refer to the main point.

Last Thoughts?

Legal passages — especially legal passages from older practice tests — have an annoying habit of sometimes rewarding test-takers who know legal terminology. That's not how it's supposed to work — you're supposed to be able to take the LSAT without any specialized knowledge. And recent legal passages have certainly done a better job of leveling the playing field by avoiding legal jargon. However, this passage uses the legal term "standing" repeatedly without ever explicitly defining that term. We'd argue that knowing what "standing" is would make understanding this passage easier. (The test-writers would presumably respond that the meaning of this term can be inferred from the passage. We'd counter by saying that's debatable, but prior knowledge of that term — as some test-takers undoubtedly possess — makes that inference unnecessary.)

At any rate, if you didn't quite understand what "standing" means, here's a quick and hopefully not-too-boring primer. "Standing" refers to one's ability to bring a lawsuit against another party. The U.S., at least, has a reputation as a litigious country. Still, we don't let anyone sue anyone else (or, more accurately, we don't let anyone take a lawsuit very far in the judicial process). Let's say I see my mortal enemy X steal from my best friend Y. As a person who respects both Y and personal property, this action offends me to my core. It offends me so much that I want to sue my mortal enemy X for theft (well, technically, I'd have to sue for "conversion," but that's another topic). Could I? No, because I would lack "standing" to bring that lawsuit against X. I wasn't the victim in that case — Y was. So Y may have the standing to sue X, but not I. If I sued X, my case would be dismissed because I lacked "standing."

So, that's what the author means when they say that Native American plaintiffs have a better chance of establishing standing — and thus recovering artifacts from burial sites — when they can show the burial sites is recent and located in an area associated with the plaintiffs (P1, S4). The legal system will allow Native American plaintiffs to use the courts to recover artifacts taken from recent graves associated with the plaintiffs. The legal system will probably dismiss the cases brought by Native American plaintiffs who try to recover artifacts from ancient graves or graves in areas where they haven't lived for a long time because these plaintiffs lack standing.

Question prompt

It can be inferred Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Legal

Strategy Overview

Refer to notes or what you highlighted/underline to locate where the passage discusses standing in disinterment cases, and refer to the relevant part of the passage as needed to find that answer choice that must be true

Answer Anticipation

For questions that ask us to infer, from a few details in the passage, an answer choice that must be true, quickly finding and reviewing that piece of information is critical. That is why we make brief notes describing the role of each paragraph and highlight or underline definitions and the minor Meta-Structures — doing so helps us find the salient information efficiently and reliably. Once we review that part of the passage, we can look through the answer choices to see which one is best supported by what we reviewed. Since the question stem asks us to make an inference, the correct answer probably won't restate something from the passage. Instead, the question will likely require us to draw a connection between a few different pieces of information.Here, the question asks us why a court would deny standing in a disinterment case (a case involving the removal of the contents of a burial site). Where did the author describe standing in these cases? Our note for the second paragraph was, "How Native American tribes can establish standing to recover artifacts taken from ancestral graves." That's a strong clue the answer is in that paragraph. And if we highlighted or underlined the list and comparison presented in that paragraph — which we recommend doing, as lists and comparisons are two of our minor Meta-Structures — finding the relevant information shouldn't take much time. (Because "standing" is used repeatedly throughout the passage, the CTRL/Command + F search function isn't recommended for this question.)In that paragraph, the author says three types of plaintiffs typically get standing in these cases: the deceased's heir, the owner of the land where the gave is located, and those who have a clear interest in preserving the grave (P2, S3). The author also says Native Americans are likely to establish standing if the grave is recent and located in an area associated with the plaintiffs (P2, S4). Therefore, we can infer that the court will deny standing to someone who is not an heir of the deceased person and lacks a clear interest in preserving an ancient grave located on land the person does not own and is not associated with. Let's look for that in the answer choices.

Answer choices

  1. A
    one who seeks, as Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice present a plaintiff who is not an heir of the deceased person and lacks a clear interest in preserving an ancient grave located on land the person does not own and is not associated with?

    Nope. This plaintiff is a "beneficiary," or heir, to the deceased person's estate. Therefore, this person probably has standing.

  2. B
    one who seeks to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this answer choice present a plaintiff who is not an heir of the deceased person and lacks a clear interest in preserving an ancient grave located on land the person does not own and is not associated with?

    No. This grave is located on the plaintiff's land. Therefore, she probably has standing.

  3. C
    one who represents a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice present a plaintiff who is not an heir of the deceased person and lacks a clear interest in preserving an ancient grave located on land the person does not own and is not associated with?

    Not quite. Although this burial site is far from the plaintiffs' current location, the tribe had "recently moved" from the burial's location. Therefore, the tribe is associated with that area and likely has standing.

  4. D
    one who seeks to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this answer choice present a plaintiff who is not an heir of the deceased person and lacks a clear interest in preserving an ancient grave located on land the person does not own and is not associated with?

    It's unclear whether this person is an "heir" as the deceased person's second cousin. However, as a family member, this plaintiff probably has an interest in preserving the artifacts in the grave. And the grave must be recent if the deceased person's second cousin is still alive. For these reasons, this plaintiff probably has standing. However, since this person doesn't fall into the three "classes of plaintiffs" enumerated by the first paragraph, cautious test-takers may look at (E) before eliminating this one.

  5. E
    one who seeks the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem

    (E) Does this answer choice present a plaintiff who is not an heir of the deceased person and lacks a clear interest in preserving an ancient grave located on land the person does not own and is not associated with?

    This plaintiff and burial ground have none of the qualities we're looking for. The plaintiff does not appear to be an heir to deceased people. We're not told this plaintiff owns the land on which the burial site is located. And the plaintiff doesn't seem to have a clear interest in preserving the burial sites. Since the artifacts were taken from "disparate tribes," this person cannot even claim to have an interest in preserving the plaintiff's tribe's communal property. Also, crucially, this is an ancient burial site. This plaintiff almost certainly doesn't have standing for all of these reasons. So, (E) is the correct answer.

What this tests

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.

View all discussions Start a discussion