PrepTest 146

[lcid:3680] Prep Test 146 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Office worker: I have Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Principle Questions / Strengthen Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    It is better to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer justifies focusing on a single project, but it doesn't justify focusing on Project 2 over Project 1.
  2. B
    It is better to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. There's no indication that the projects can't be finished, just that the first is late and the second is at risk of missing the deadline.
  3. C
    It is better to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. There's no indication that either project is optional—in fact, they're noted as being equally important, so it's unlikely that one is optional and the other isn't.
  4. D
    It is better not Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer justifies not worrying about something, but it doesn't justify focusing on Project 2.
  5. E
    It is better to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Strengthen (Principle)

    Stimulus Summary:
    Two equally important, undone projects:

    Project 1 Ð Late already, working on it would make Project 2 late
    Project 2 Ð No guarantees it can be done on time

    Conclusion Ð All time should be dedicated to Project 2

    Answer Anticipation:
    Strengthen (Principle) questions require us to find a principle that connects the details in the premise to the judgment in the conclusion.

    Here, the judgment in the conclusion is that all time should be spent on Project 2. The premises bring up a lot of details about Project 1 and Project 2 that could lead to that conclusion, however, so we need to stay flexible. Anything that connects a piece of information we know about these projects to focusing on Project 2 will serve as a correct answer—for instance, something stating that finishing a project on time is more important than finishing a late project.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer connects to the details in the stimulus. Project 1 is late; Project 2 isn't; and they're both equally important. If it's better to work to finish a project on time than finish one that's late, then Project 2 should be the focus, as the conclusion states.

    Key Takeaway:
    Don't overcomplicate Strengthen (Principle) questions! The answer will connect a detail from the premise to the judgment in the conclusion.

What this tests

Discussion

  • Why not D? 4 replies

    Started by Liam