PrepTest 146
[lcid:3680] Prep Test 146 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
The production of leather
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Must Be True Questions
Answer choices
-
AThe price of any Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. While the stimulus does focus on the effect of fashionability on pricing, it doesn't ever establish that it "depends more" on that than materials. Prices are rising and falling based on what's in style, but the materials could be a primary determinant with fashionability being secondary. -
BIt is more important Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. Practicality is out of scope of the stimulus. -
CMaterials that require relatively Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. Leather/fur were fashionable at one time despite being labor intensive. -
DThe appearance of a Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. There's no indication that fashionability is solely related to appearance—maybe leather/fur are out of style because of a drive to respect animal rights in the fashion industry. -
ECultural trends tend to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Facts
Question Type:
Strengthen
Stimulus Summary:
Leather/fur Ð Production is expensive, but as they have become out of style, prices have dropped
Other materials Ð Production is easier and prices have risen as they came into style
Answer Anticipation:
The stimulus highlights two examples of the intersection between production costs, style, and prices of clothing materials, so we should look for a relationship that holds between them.
As noted, there are three points of comparison: production costs, style, and price. Price seems to be somewhat based on production cost—leather/fur started high because it was expensive to produce, whereas other materials started low because they're easier—but style has driven the price of leather/fur down and other materials up. Therefore, we should look for an answer that highlights the role style plays in pricing since that relationship seems to be more direct and the focus of the stimulus.
Answer Explanation:
The pricing of leather/fur and other materials is shown in the stimulus to be affected by whether they're in fashion. This answer generalizes that trend, so the stimulus conforms to it, making it our answer.
Key Takeaway:
For questions asking you to find a generalization that the stimulus conforms to, don't worry about going too big—as long as the stimulus falls into the category discussed, it's fine if the correct answer applies to many other situations, as well.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Please explain 9 replies
Started by rmkrutz@crimson.ua.edu