PrepTest 146

[lcid:3680] Prep Test 146 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Modest amounts of exercise Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Must Be True Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Having a strenuous workout Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Facts

    Question Type:
    Must Be True

    Stimulus Summary:

    Modest exercise can improve cardiovascular health.
    Only a half hour of walking most days is enough to see benefits.
    More vigorous exercise is more effective.

    Answer Anticipation:
    When dealing with a wishy-washy stimulus like this one, where there's a lot of uncertain language, it's important to focus on the elements that have enough logical force to support an answer. Let's go through each one to see the thought process behind it!

    The first statement is weak, but it's causal, so it could lead to an inference. The recommendation is probably not going to lead to an inference (it's hard to see what it would be other than a restatement of it), but the second half of that sentence sets a strong limit on necessary exercise ("one need only"). The first half of the last sentence sets up a direct comparative relationship, so it could play a role in a correct answer, but the second half doesn't say much since it tells us a certain relationship doesn't exist (and there are many, many relationships that don't exist), so we should downplay that.

    So at the end of the day, we're left with the statements highlighted in our Summary. Looking to see if we can combine them, it appears as if modest exercise (half hour of a brisk walk) can lead to improvements in CV health, but more vigorous exercise would do more.

    Answer Explanation:
    The stimulus establishes that modest exercise most days of the week can produce a dramatic improvement in CV health, and that more vigorous exercise is more effective. Therefore, a strenuous workout most days of the week would have at least a dramatic effect on CV health, and thus this answer is supported.

    Key Takeaway:
    When not dealing in conditional statements, Must Be True questions generally provide a mix of statements of varying types of logic and force. Start to develop a sense for the types of statements that tend to be involved in the correct answer so you can cut through the ones that aren't and answer the question more efficiently.
  2. B
    Doing the equivalent of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. The stimulus establishes that the brisk walk on "those days"—i.e., "most days"—is enough to see these benefits, but 2-3 days doesn't qualify as "most days."
  3. C
    It is possible to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer is contradicted by the stimulus when it states that more vigorous exercise "is more effective."
  4. D
    Aside from exercise, there Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. While the stimulus establishes that certain types and amounts of exercise will benefit CV health, there's no suggestion that it's the only way to do so.
  5. E
    To obtain a dramatic Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. The stimulus specifically notes that strenuous workouts are "not absolutely necessary."

What this tests

Discussion