PrepTest 143
[lcid:3670] Prep Test 143 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S3
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
The size of the
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: D
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Must Be True Questions
Answer choices
-
APredators are unable to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is too extreme. While the preyed upon birds generally had smaller spleens, and smaller spleens generally indicate health issues, they're both too weak to support this answer about what predators are "unable" to do. -
BMost birds with smaller Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. This answer essentially reverses a most statement. Just because most birds killed by predators have smaller spleens doesn't mean most birds with smaller spleens will be killed by predators. -
CPredators can sense whether Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. While the argument strongly suggests the predators are generally getting sick birds, there's no indication that they can tell they're sick—it might just be that they're easier to catch. -
DSickly birds are more Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Facts
Question Type:
Must Be True
Stimulus Summary:
Health is positively correlated with spleen size in birds. Birds eaten by predators generally have smaller spleens than those that die by accident.
Answer Anticipation:
When a Must Be True stimulus has statements that overlap, the correct answer almost always combines them to form an inference. Here, the two statements both talk about spleen size. If smaller spleens are a sign of sickness, then those birds the predators got were sicker than the ones that die in an accident. The correct answer should draw this connection.
Answer Explanation:
This answer draws the connection formed by the two premises. If predators generally catch birds with small spleens, and birds with small spleens are generally sick, then it can be inferred that the predators are generally catching sicker birds—and thus those birds are more likely to be captured by predators than healthy ones.
Key Takeaway:
Inferences are generally drawn when two statements can be combined. In order to combine two statements, they generally have to overlap—share some key concept. Look for these overlaps in Must Be True questions to better anticipate answers! -
ESmall spleen size is Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. Correlation doesn't establish causation! It's just as likely that things causing illness in birds also shrink spleen size or that bird illnesses generally cause the spleen to shrink as it is that the spleen size itself causes illness.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Started by Tyler808