PrepTest 143
[lcid:3668] Prep Test 143 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
If people refrained from
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Methods of Reasoning Questions
Answer choices
-
AIt is the conclusion Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Valid
Question Type:
Argument Structure
Stimulus Summary:
People are polite to each other → Society improves
Enforcing laws requiring politeness would create more problems than impoliteness
Therefore, laws requiring politeness won't improve society
Answer Anticipation:
The first statement sets up a conditional rule that establishes what would happen to society with a given change. Since it's a prediction, there's a chance it's the main point. However, the next sentence immediately pivots away from it ("But") to the statement in question. This is a competing prediction, so since the argument pivots to it and it's a prediction, it's likely the main point of the argument. That's backed up by the following statement explaining why it's true, thus serving as a premise.
The correct answer should highlight that it's the conclusion of the argument, and if there's more than one answer stating that it's the conclusion, then we should look for one that says it puts a limitation on the opposing point (politeness will help society as long as it's not mandated).
Answer Explanation:
This answer reflects that the statement is a pivot away from one prediction, limiting it, that has support in the final sentence.
Key Takeaway:
Always note pivot words—they define when the author shifts away from an opposing point or a premise that she's not generally going to rely on in reaching the main point. Also, predictions tend to be conclusions, even when they're conditional. -
BIt is cited as Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. The argument doesn't make sense with this second sentence serving as a premise for the final sentence, so it can't be a premise. -
CIt is cited as Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. This answer describes an argument with an intermediate conclusion. Since there are only two statements making up the author's argument (the first being an opposing point), this can't be correct. -
DIt is cited as Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. This answer, again, brings up an argument with three pieces, and the author's argument has only two (discounting the opposing point, which isn't a part of the author's argument). -
EIt describes a phenomenon Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. The phenomenon is actually unstated—the current state of society and the level of impoliteness.
What this tests
Discussion
-
First and second sentence 2 replies
Started by DavidW