PrepTest 142
[lcid:3667] Prep Test 142 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Ming: Since trans fat
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Misinterpretation Questions
Answer choices
-
Athe more trans fat Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This doesn't seem like something Ming would disagree with. However, neither speaker is arguing that desserts with trans fats are healthy, so this answer doesn't really highlight a misinterpretation. -
Bfood that doesnt contain Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument/Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed/Flawed
Question Type:
Misinterpretation
Stimulus Summary:
M: Trans fats are really bad for you, so it's good that many cookie companies no longer use it.
C: That makes no sense. Desserts are still bad for you.
Answer Anticipation:
Misinterpretation questions generally fall into two camps. Either it asks you about a single word that the second speaker is misinterpreting, or the second speaker has a much broader misinterpretation of the opposing point's argument overall. This question falls into the latter.
When that's the case, it can be helpful to forget for a second about what the first speaker argued and focus on what the second speaker is saying. What viewpoint would their counterargument rebut? That's likely what they misinterpreted the first speaker to be saying.
Here, Carol rebuts that even without the particularly unhealthy trans fat, desserts are not healthy foods. That must suggest she believes Ming concluded that they are healthy foods. Since Ming only argued that they're healthier in that they no longer have trans fats, that's a misinterpretation.
Answer Explanation:
Carol rebuts Ming's argument by saying that desserts—even without trans fats—are unhealthy. For her to believe that rebuts Ming's argument, she must believe that Ming said desserts without trans fats are healthy, as this answer choice says.
Key Takeaway:
When a Misinterpretation question features the second speaker misinterpreting more than a single word in the first speaker's argument, forget the first speaker and think about what argument the second speaker would successfully rebut with her comments. That's going to reflect the misinterpretation. -
Cif a food is Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. While "not healthy" and "unhealthy" are different concepts, there's no confusion over that point here. -
Da cookie containing any Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. Ming does seem to believe that a cookie with any trans fat in it is unhealthy—she's celebrating many cookie companies completely eliminating it from their product. -
Econsumers should purchase cookies Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. While not directly established in Ming's argument, this doesn't disagree with her viewpoint, so it's not a misinterpretation.
What this tests
Discussion
-
question 1 reply
Started by Ceci