PrepTest 141

[lcid:3661] Prep Test 141 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S2 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Jeneta: Increasingly, I've noticed Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Paradox Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Customers regard themselves as Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. If anything, this suggests the situation with the salesperson and the friend are similar, in that both are viewed as thanking for a favor, so it would enhance the paradox.
  2. B
    Salespeople are often instructed Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. This doesn't explain why the customer responds with a, "Thank you," instead of, "You're welcome," as they do when a friend says it.
  3. C
    Salespeople do not regard Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. The behavior creating the paradox is on the part of the customer, so what the salesperson believes won't help to resolve that paradox.
  4. D
    The way that people Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. Jeneta notes that she's noted the weird response to salespeople thanking customers is "[i]ncreasing[]" suggesting that it's not a customary response. Even if it were, that still wouldn't explain why it developed as a custom.
  5. E
    In a commercial transaction, Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Facts

    Question Type:
    Paradox

    Stimulus Summary:Person to salesperson: "Thank you!," "Thank you!"
    Person to friend: "Thank you!," "You're welcome!"

    Answer Anticipation:
    The stimulus highlights different behavior taken by individuals in similar situations. When a salesperson thanks someone, they thank them back; when a friend thanks a person, they say, "You're welcome!"

    We need to explain this different behavior. Since both situations have a similarity—someone says, "Thank you!"—the explanation probably won't come from that. However, the difference between the scenarios—who says it—will need to be tied into the different response. Anything that highlights a difference between friends and salespeople that would lead to the different response will serve to resolve the paradox.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer highlights a relevant difference between a friend thanking you and a salesperson doing so. In the former, the benefit isn't mutual, so there's no reason to thank someone back. However, when buying something, the customer views themselves as receiving a benefit, thus creating a reason to thank the salesperson back. Since this answer highlights a relevant difference that can explain the different behavior, it's the correct answer.

    Key Takeaway:
    Paradox questions frequently deal with different responses to similar situations. When that happens, the correct answer should highlight a relevant difference that explains the different response. More broadly, Paradox questions are frequently about comparisons, and framing them through that lens can be helpful.

What this tests

Discussion