PrepTest 141
[lcid:3661] Prep Test 141 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S2
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Jeneta: Increasingly, I've noticed
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Paradox Questions
Answer choices
-
ACustomers regard themselves as Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. If anything, this suggests the situation with the salesperson and the friend are similar, in that both are viewed as thanking for a favor, so it would enhance the paradox. -
BSalespeople are often instructed Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. This doesn't explain why the customer responds with a, "Thank you," instead of, "You're welcome," as they do when a friend says it. -
CSalespeople do not regard Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. The behavior creating the paradox is on the part of the customer, so what the salesperson believes won't help to resolve that paradox. -
DThe way that people Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. Jeneta notes that she's noted the weird response to salespeople thanking customers is "[i]ncreasing[]" suggesting that it's not a customary response. Even if it were, that still wouldn't explain why it developed as a custom. -
EIn a commercial transaction, Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Facts
Question Type:
Paradox
Stimulus Summary:Person to salesperson: "Thank you!," "Thank you!"
Person to friend: "Thank you!," "You're welcome!"
Answer Anticipation:
The stimulus highlights different behavior taken by individuals in similar situations. When a salesperson thanks someone, they thank them back; when a friend thanks a person, they say, "You're welcome!"
We need to explain this different behavior. Since both situations have a similarity—someone says, "Thank you!"—the explanation probably won't come from that. However, the difference between the scenarios—who says it—will need to be tied into the different response. Anything that highlights a difference between friends and salespeople that would lead to the different response will serve to resolve the paradox.
Answer Explanation:
This answer highlights a relevant difference between a friend thanking you and a salesperson doing so. In the former, the benefit isn't mutual, so there's no reason to thank someone back. However, when buying something, the customer views themselves as receiving a benefit, thus creating a reason to thank the salesperson back. Since this answer highlights a relevant difference that can explain the different behavior, it's the correct answer.
Key Takeaway:
Paradox questions frequently deal with different responses to similar situations. When that happens, the correct answer should highlight a relevant difference that explains the different response. More broadly, Paradox questions are frequently about comparisons, and framing them through that lens can be helpful.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Explanation please 1 reply
Started by Anna