Can someone explain the analogy please?
Started by
ShawnHill
· started 2021-07-21 02:04
· last activity 2024-10-04 02:02
· 1 reply
So, I was able to figure out the correct answer, but I can’t figure out what Hudson is saying. How does this analogy relate to the first speaker’s claims?
-
Emil-Kunkin
· 2024-10-04 02:02
I agree this is a terrible analogy, but I think there is a kernel there, even if it's a small one. In both cases, we are rejecting the idea that one cannot be considered a member of a category on the grounds that it requires some future thing.
Sign in to reply.