PrepTest 148

[lcid:3690] Prep Test 148 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S3 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

In the earliest video Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Strengthen with Sufficient Premise Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    There are no newer, Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer choice doesn't connect to the new term in the conclusion ("less compelling"), so it can't allow that conclusion to be properly drawn.
  2. B
    Most early video games Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. The conclusion specifically limits itself to discussing how players identify with the main character ("in this respect"), so other respects are out of scope.
  3. C
    The technical sophistication necessary Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. Noting that the technical sophistication in the conclusion can't make something "fully compelling" doesn't justify the relative conclusion—that something is less compelling.
  4. D
    When players cannot easily Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Strengthen with Sufficient Premise

    Stimulus Summary:
    Newer video games have more realistic graphics, making it harder for players to identify with the main character, thus making them less compelling.

    Answer Anticipation:
    Stripping the rest of this stimulus away, the argument boils down to this: New technology has made it harder for players to identify with the main character they control, so it makes the game less compelling. That jumps from a premise about identifying with a character to a conclusion about the game being less compelling. The correct answer, therefore, will connect identifying less with the main character to finding the game less compelling.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer connects decreased identification with players finding a game less compelling. This answer is also stronger than the conclusion ("usually" vs. "often"), so it's strong enough to justify the conclusion. This answer is therefore correct.

    Key Takeaway:
    For Strengthen with Sufficient Premise questions that feature a new term in the conclusion, the correct answer will need to connect a premise to that new term. It can be an easy way to make eliminations—get rid of anything that doesn't mention that new term.
  5. E
    If some aspect of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer connects the ideas that need to be connected, but it's the reverse of what we're looking for. When answers are phrased as conditionals, we need the premise to align with the sufficient condition and the conclusion with the necessary condition.

What this tests

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.