PrepTest 140
[lcid:3658] Prep Test 140 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S3
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Consumer advocate: Even if
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Main Point Questions
Answer choices
-
AThe heavier of two Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Valid
Question Type:
Main Point
Stimulus Summary:
Water makes up a lot of canned fruit/veggies weight, and manufacturers can include more water, so weighing more doesn't guarantee more fruit/veggies.
Answer Anticipation:
The argument starts with a statement that needs explanation—why does weight not determine the amount of food? The next statements are facts that support that contention by talking about what makes up some weight in canned foods, and the last sentence serves the same function as the preceding sentence (a premise) since it starts with "And," so that first sentence is the main point of the argument.
Answer Explanation:
This answer reflects the first statement of the argument which is the main point, so it's correct.
Key Takeaway:
Start to note some non-standard structural indicator words for different argument pieces. Here, the "Even if" and "not necessarily" are both "soft" conclusion indicator words—they're not as certain as a "Thus" or "Therefore," but they are in conclusions more frequently than in premises. Additionally, connecting ideas with "And" and no other keyword suggests the two ideas serve the same general function in the argument—here, it let us determine that the last statement was also a premise. -
BThe weight of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. This is a premise explaining why weight doesn't determine the amount of food. -
CNothing stops unscrupulous canning Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is a premise backing up that water weight sometimes makes up a disproportionate amount of the weight of a can of fruit/veggies, and it's structurally introduced as having the same role as the preceding statement, which was a premise. -
DSome canning companies include Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. A great trap answer choice! However, the conclusion is about cans of different weights, not cans of the same weight, and it specifics fruits/veggies instead of discussing food generally. -
EThe heavier of two Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is an implication of the argument, but it's not directly stated—the conclusion is about there being less fruit/veggies, not more water. And, in fact, having more water doesn't guarantee there's less food in that can—the additional weight could be mostly water but some food, thus differing from the conclusion.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Help 1 reply
Started by Batman