PrepTest 140
[lcid:3658] Prep Test 140 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S3
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Secondary school students achieve
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strengthen with Sufficient Premise Questions / Sufficient & Necessary Questions
Answer choices
-
AAs long as secondary Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Strengthen with Sufficient Premise
Stimulus Summary:
Appropriate teaching methods AND Significant effort → Broad mastery
Therefore: not Broad mastery → not Appropriate teaching methods
Answer Anticipation:
The argument establishes a conditional and then concludes a version of the contrapositive (missing one of the sufficient conditions), so let's contrapose the premise in order to get it to line up:
not Broad mastery → not Appropriate teaching methods OR not Significant effort
We can see that the conclusion more or less matches up with it minus one of the optional necessary conditions. So in order to get to the conclusion, we need to either rule out not Significant effort, or we need to guarantee not Appropriate teaching methods. The correct answer could either directly rule out the one option ("All students put in significant effort in their studies"), or we can connect those two necessary conditions so that not Appropriate teaching methods is guaranteed (and take the contrapositive):
not Significant effort → not Appropriate teaching methods
Appropriate teaching methods → Significant effort
Answer Explanation:
Appropriate teaching methods → Significant effort. This matches our anticipation. If this answer is true, then the premise guarantees that lacking broad mastery guarantees the studies weren't taught appropriately or didn't put in significant effort, and if they didn't put in significant effort, then they weren't taught appropriately. Therefore, either outcome leads back to not Appropriate teaching methods, thus validating the conclusion.
Key Takeaway:
When an argument establishes a premise with two optional necessary conditions, and it concludes one of them, the correct answer will likely connect the other condition to the first, as we saw here. Additionally, in Strengthen with Sufficient Premise questions, be sure that you're focused on the logical force of the conclusion, as the correct answer will usually meet or exceed that strength in order to be strong enough to justify it. -
BEven if secondary school Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. not Significant effort → not Broad mastery. This answer is a reversal of a portion of the argument. And by stating that something happens "Even if" appropriate methods are used, it's removing appropriate methods as a relevant factor in that relationship, so it's incorrect. -
CSecondary school students do Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. not Appropriate methods → not Broad mastery. This answer is the reversal of the conclusion, so it won't help to justify it. -
DTeaching secondary school students Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. "[D]oes not always result" is too weak to justify the conclusion of this argument, which is much more definitive than that. -
ESecondary school students who Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. "[D]o not always" is too weak to justify the conclusion of this argument, which is much more definitive than that.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Why A over E 1 reply
Started by rwhittle@colgate.edu
-
still confused 1 reply
Started by kens
-
Explanation 2 replies
Started by sairaj87