Answer Choice C

Still waiting on a response, please.

I need help here as well

Hi @Mikegreen and @kaiplanet, You're right to be cautious about implications for the LSAT. Remember, however, that there's a difference between something being implied by everything else the stimulus has told you, and making unjustified assumptions that aren't supported by anything in the stimulus. Here, we are talking about making contributions to science. Then, we say that ameuteur scientists have also provided many significant contributions. The "to science" here is just implied by the basic sentence structure, as well as by the subject matter. Take another example. If I say, "My friend is an excellent tennis player, and I'm pretty good as well", I didn't say what specifically I'm good at, but clearly I'm talking about tennis. That's what's going on here. The kind of assumptions we want to avoid are those not justified by the stimulus. For example, we wouldn't like an answer option that said "some amateur scientists have made significant contributions to physics" because even though physics is a part of science that would be a big jump that is unjustified by the stimulus. Hope this helps, feel free to follow up.