Why not E?
Started by MrLaw · started 2020-06-25 23:00 · last activity 2020-09-30 03:59 · 3 replies
I'm at a loss as to how the argument suggests that poisoning the lake was unsuccessful. As I read the text, I only see that the negative effect of poisoning the lake was tainted water which infuriated residents and negatively impacted tourism. How should we induce from this that poisoning the lake was unsuccessful in also killing pike?