PrepTest 137

[lcid:3647] Prep Test 137 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Even though MacArthur's diet Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Principle Questions / Strengthen Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    One should not undertake Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. First, it's unclear if MacArthur knew that her book would hurt people's health—she may have not but should have known. Second, the stimulus established that the book damaged people's health, not "seriously" damaged it.
  2. B
    One should not follow Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. The stimulus is about one person not doing something because it damages someone else's health, whereas this answer is about not doing something that can possibly damage your own health.
  3. C
    One should publish a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer establishes a principle justifying the publishing of a book, whereas the judgment in the conclusion is that a book shouldn't be published.
  4. D
    One should not publish Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. While this answer provides a principle that can justify the conclusion, it doesn't have a sufficient condition that matches the stimulus. Presumably MacArthur does believe that her book would help people reach the goal of losing weight.
  5. E
    One should not publish Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Principle (Strengthen)

    Stimulus Summary:
    MacArthur's book recommended a dangerously low amount of fruits/veggies, and as a physician, MacArthur should have known this, so she knew/should have known that.

    Answer Anticipation:
    Principle (Strengthen) questions ask us to justify the judgment in the conclusion based on the details in the premises.

    Here, the conclusion is that MacArthur shouldn't have published her diet book. Why not? Because it included a recommendation that "undoubtedly damaged" some people's health, and MacArthur knew/should have known it would. So the principle will need to connect these ideas:

    If someone knows or should know that a book they are publishing will damage people's health, they shouldn't publish that book.

    Answer Explanation:
    The stimulus establishes that MacArthur knows or should have known that her recommendation would damage the health of those who followed it. This answer, therefore, justifies the conclusion that she shouldn't have published it, so this is the correct answer.

    Key Takeaway:
    Don't spend more time than needed on these Principle (Strengthen) questions. Find the conclusion, identify the relevant premises/details, and pick the answer that connects them.

What this tests

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.