PrepTest 137
[lcid:3644] Prep Test 137 LSAT — Reading Comp — S1
Reading comp
Question prompt
In 1996, all ResearchTech
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Parallel Reasoning Questions
Answer choices
-
ALegal restrictions on consumer Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. The initial premise here isn't an either/or statement—it presents two examples of a broader statement, but that doesn't guarantee that everything that meets the criteria must fall into one of these two conditions. -
BLegal restrictions on consumer Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Valid
Question Type:
Parallel Reasoning
Stimulus Summary:
RT project in Ô96 → Funded by government OR Funded by corporation
Gilman Survey: RT project in Ô96 AND not Funded by government
Therefore - Gilman Survey: Funded by corporation
Answer Anticipation:
This Parallel Reasoning question heavily features conditional logic, so we should look for an answer that matches up with it:
A → B OR C
D: A AND not B
Therefore - D: C
So we need an answer that establishes one of two things must be true in a certain situation, and then one of those two is ruled out in the situation, allowing the other to be concluded.
Answer Explanation:
Legal restriction on consumer purchase → Paternalist OR Protect civil liberties
O304: Legal restriction on consumer purchase AND not Paternalistic
Therefore - O304: Protect civil liberties
This answer has the same structure as the stimulus, so it's the correct answer.
Key Takeaway:
Many people taking the LSAT hate conditional logic, but it's something that you can learn through memorization and practice and apply following a set of rules that don't change. This will lead to correct answers faster than the average test taker. Make sure you're on the right side of that average! -
COrdinance 304 is not Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. This answer never establishes that O304 is a legal restriction on consumer purchases, so the conditional doesn't necessarily apply and thus this argument is flawed (and not parallel). -
DLegal restrictions on consumer Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. This answer has a second conditional premise ("All ordinances . . . "), so it's not parallel. This answer also features an illegal reversal. -
EOrdinance 304 should be Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. This answer jumps from the situations under which O304 should be exercised to a situation where it was exercised. That's a jump, and therefore this argument is also flawed and not parallel with the stimulus.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Answer choice B 1 reply
Started by amarachicynthia
-
Started by mnieslanik