PrepTest 137
[lcid:3644] Prep Test 137 LSAT — Reading Comp — S1
Reading comp
Question prompt
The hormone testosterone protects
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Argument Completion Questions
Answer choices
-
Aanyone whose brain cells Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is too definitive in saying that "anyone" prone to brain injury will get Alzheimer's. While susceptibility to brain injury makes one susceptible to Alzheimer's that's about risk, not certainty. -
Bwhether a person develops Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is too strong in saying that beta-amyloid "entirely" determines Alzheimer's risk. The stimulus even notes another factor—brain injury. -
CAlzheimer's disease leads to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. This answer reverses the causality—lowered testosterone can contribute to Alzheimer's but that doesn't indicate that Alzheimer's will lower testosterone levels. -
Donly people with Alzheimer's Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is too strong and a reversal. While brain injury can contribute to Alzheimer's, a risk of Alzheimer's doesn't determine who is at risk of brain injury. Pretty much anyone is at risk of brain injury from falls! -
Ea decline in testosterone Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Facts
Question Type:
Argument Completion
Stimulus Summary:
Testosterone effects - Protect brain, reduce beta-amyloid
Brain injury and beta-amyloid effects - Alzheimer's
Therefore - __________
Answer Anticipation:
There's a lot of causal language throughout this stimulus, bringing up two effects of testosterone. These effects themselves are noted as being causally related to Alzheimer's disease. And, much like conditional statements, we can "chain" causal statements together. Unlike conditional statements, however, we can generally infer that removing a cause should also lower risk of the effect (which would be an illegal negation in a conditional statement).
So here, since beta-amyloid and brain injury both contribute to Alzheimer's, removing or reducing them should lower Alzheimer's risk. And testosterone is shown to reduce both of them. Putting these statements together, we can conclude that testosterone should lower Alzheimer's risk, and thus lower testosterone levels can contribute to Alzheimer's risk. Let's find one of those two in the answer choices!
Answer Explanation:
The argument establishes a causal relationship between testosterone and risk factors for Alzheimer's. Thus, lowering testosterone should increase those risk factors, thus increasing Alzheimer's risk.
Key Takeaway:
Causal statements can be chained together much like conditional statements. However, unlike conditional statements, causal statements can also lead to negation inferences—removing a cause should have some impact on the presence of the effect.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Correlation / Causation 1 reply
Started by Anna20