Please Explain
Started by
rmkrutz@crimson.ua.edu
· started 2018-05-05 16:06
· last activity 2018-05-06 16:25
· 1 reply
It seems to me like answer choice A is stating the flaw backwards so I was wondering if you could explain answer choice A so I can see where I'm wrong in my interpretation of it?
-
Anita
· 2018-05-06 16:25
The Southern Tier Project, we are told, was egregiously wasteful. The bridge was a part of this project. The mayor, however, says the bridge renovation was not wasteful. The speaker tells us the mayor is then wrong. The problem is that the bridge itself could have been entirely on budget, but it was some other part of the STP that was the waste of money. This is what answer A tells us - that the part (the bridge renovation) had a quality because the whole (STP) had it.
Sign in to reply.