PrepTest 136

[lcid:3641] Prep Test 136 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S2 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Mayor: There has been Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Errors in Reasoning Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    It bases a projection Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. If the conservative estimates are enough to make it clear action is needed, then the less conservative estimates will make the need for action even clearer.
  2. B
    It takes for granted Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. Doing nothing and doing something are mutually exclusive options. The Mayor treats her plan as the only viable option, not two separate plans as mutually exclusive. This answer would be correct if the Mayor brought up two plans and concluded only one could be done.
  3. C
    It fails to consider Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. A decrease in the rate of traffic is still an increase, and if gridlock happens before then, it'd only get worse as the traffic keeps increasing—even if that growth slowed down.
  4. D
    It fails to address Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. While it doesn't directly attack cost, it does state that allowing the gridlock is not a viable option, so whether that's because of the economic impact or otherwise, it's off the table.
  5. E
    It presents a choice Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Errors in Reasoning

    Stimulus Summary:
    M: We need to accommodate traffic. We either adopt my plan, or do nothing. We can't do nothing, so we must adopt my plan.

    Answer Anticipation:
    The conclusion of this argument is a recommendation to adopt a plan. Why? Because doing nothing isn't an option, and this plan is on the table.

    Whenever a conclusion makes a recommendation, you should consider whether the argument properly compares the recommended action to viable alternatives. Here, the Mayor does establish that one option—doing nothing—isn't viable, but she never talks about other options. She treats her plan as the only viable one, thus creating a false choice. The correct answer should point that out.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer highlights the Mayor's false choice—either adopt my plan, or do nothing. There could be other ways to prevent the gridlock from developing!

    Key Takeaway:
    When a recommendation is made, start to think about whether the argument has brought up all relevant options, the criteria for making a selection, and a comparison of that criteria across all options. Short of that, the recommendation is flawed!

What this tests

Discussion