Haven't understood the question yet.

Started by inaecavalcante · started 2022-12-30 00:21 · last activity 2023-08-23 06:08 · 2 replies

Hi, I see that this is an except question, but I still can't see how each one of the alternatives weakens/strengths the argument. Could we go through each answer choice?

Replies

  1. Emil-Kunkin · 2023-01-24 22:31

    Hi, the author tries to tell us that we should avoid irradiated food for several reasons. A weakens the argument by showing that one of the negative consequences that the author cites is extremely rare. B does not weaken the argument, and is thus correct. C contradicts one of the negative effects the author cites of irradiation. D shows that a harmful effect the author shows is not more harmful than for food that is not irradiated. E directly refutes the idea that irradiated foods cause cancer.
  2. Sierra · 2023-08-23 06:08

    I am still confused by this question and feel that there may be an error here. Option B on the practice test reads: "Cancer and other serious health problems have many causes that are unrelated to radioactive substances and gamma rays." Option B when you click "view question" within the discussion tab reads: "The amount of harmful chemicals found in irradiated foods is less than the amount that occurs naturally in most kinds of foods."

Sign in to reply.