Could someone please explain this?
Started by
jingjingxiao11111@gmail.com
· started 2022-02-16 19:36
· last activity 2023-09-27 03:15
· 2 replies
Thanks
-
Ashley-Tien-2
· 2023-09-24 15:59
I was down to A and E and picked A because I didn't think E went far enough when it said persistance was noted? isn't noted just acknowledged? I thought the final paragraph went a lot further than that? I thought the determinism stuff was to refine the ideas presented earlier in the passage, like the viewpoint about W's workbeing witty and amiable?
-
Emil-Kunkin
· 2023-09-27 03:15
While noted is a slightly underwhelming term, it does completely describe what the author does. The author in the final paragraph gives us a fairly good overview of how the mistaken view of Watteau has survived despite its clear factual issues. I wouldn't worry about a term being too weak as long as it is still factually accurate, although I would worry about being too strong. Note that this does not apply to questions that ask about the authors tone.
Sign in to reply.