PrepTest 135

[lcid:3638] Prep Test 135 LSAT — Reading Comp — S3 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 1-7  .        In the 1980s there was a proliferation of poetry  . collections, short stories, and novels published Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Humanities


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • 1980s trends in U.S. Latina writings (proliferation of poetry/short stories/novels, and three notable autobiographies)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of two 1980s trends in writings by Latina women in the U.S., according to the author:
      • 1980s: Lots of poetry, short stories, and novels (first sentence)
      • End of 1980s: Autobiography (3 examples) (last sentence)
    • List of notable autobiographies of Latina women in the U.S., according to the author:
      • Loving in the War Years: Lo Que Nunca Pasó Por Sus Labios by Cherríe Moraga; Getting Home Alive, by Aurora Levins Morales and Rosario Morales; and Borderlands/La Frontera, by Gloria Anzaldúa (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "proliferation" (first sentence); "notable" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • How the three autobiographies innovate (combine English and Spanish, mix genres to explore ethnicity, gender, and language)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • The three notable autobiographies innovate by mixing English and Spanish and by combining multiple genres (essays, poems, short stories, etc.) to explore the relationship between ethnicity, gender, and language (first through last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "innovative at many levels" (first sentence); "confront" (second sentence); "manifests itself" (last sentence); "without, for the most part, giving preference" (last sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Specific innovations in each autobiography (all use multiple genres and voices to express complex identities)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • List of specific innovations in each autobiography, according to the author:
      • Borderlands/La Frontera: personal and community history by mixing narrative and poetry (first sentence)
      • Loving in the War Years: Mixes genres; not chronological (political development) (second sentence)
      • Getting Home Alive: Even more innovative, mixes mom and daughter viewpoints (fourth through sixth sentences)
    • Author's view:
      • All autobiographies mix genres and voices to express the formation of their author's complex identity (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "departs even further from conventions" (fourth sentence); "may seem fragmentary and confusing, it is in fact a fully intentional and carefully designed experiment with literary structure" (sixth sentence); "employ multigeneric and multivocal forms to express the complexities inherent in the formation of their identities" (last sentence)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Author's conclusion (writers revolutionized autobiography to make it fit their voices and experiences)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • These autobiographies by Latina women in the U.S. revolutionized the genre to make a better vehicle to express their voices and experiences (first and last sentences)
    • Author's attitude: "revolutionized" (first sentence); "redrawing the boundaries" (first sentence); "more amenable to teh expression of their own experience" (first sentence); "shown a strong determination" (last sentence)

Main Point: By mixing forms and genres, breaking with traditional timelines, and mixing multiple voices, the autobiographies published by Latina women at the end of the 1980s innovated within the genre and allowed the authors to fully capture their identities and experiences.

Meta-Structure?

Innovative Subject: This passage uses one of the most common major Meta-Structures for humanities passages — Innovative [Subject]. These humanities passages describe what is groundbreaking and unique about an artist, movement, or group of artists. The word "[Subject]" is just a placeholder for the artist, movement, or group of artists. This passage discusses three authors and their innovations in the autobiography genre. So, we can think of this as an Innovative Autobiographies or Innovative Autobiographers passage (or an Innovative Autobiografía passage, if you want to mix English and Spanish like these writers).

In Innovative [Subject] passages, the main point is generally the author's opinion on the innovation. The author really goes overboard with their praise for these autobiographies — especially in the fourth paragraph, where the author summarizes their opinion. We can use that paragraph as the main point whenever a question requires us to consider that main point. Alternatively, we can summarize the author's opinions for them. We elected to use the latter approach, including some of the specific innovations the author outlined in the third paragraph.

Last Thoughts?

Paragraph 3 is really long and detailed, so we should be sure to head back to check details as necessary when answering questions about the specific innovations in each autobiography.

Question prompt

Based on the passage, Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Humanities

Strategy Overview

Review the main point, and use notes or highlighted/underlined text in the passage to recall the author's attitude on this topic, and find the answer that best reflects your understanding of the main point/author's attitude

Answer Anticipation

For Author's Attitude questions, the answer choices tend to fall into one of two categories: two-word answer choices or opinion + detail answer choices. The former generally capture only the direction (positive/negative/neutral) and strength of the author's opinion. The latter generally captures the direction and strength in one word, then fills in some details in the passage. This one falls into the latter camp.In this case, we can use our notes or what we highlighted/underlined to identify where the author expressed their opinion on Getting Home Alive. Before we get into specifics, we should note that the author believes each work discussed in the passage innovated within the genre of autobiography to express its authors' identity and experiences, so that's the "big picture" attitude that might show up in the correct answer. But the author specifically noted that Getting Home Alive "departs even further" from conventions by bringing two voices together (P3, S4). The author notes that its innovative structure "may seem fragmentary and confusing," but it's a "fully intentional and carefully designed" experiment (P3, S6). That represents two different attitudes towards the work — readers might find it confusing, but it's intentional and careful — that could show up in the correct answer.So we have an overall attitude and two more specific attitudes towards Getting Home Alive to look for. Unfortunately, two are positive and one is negative (the opinion on how readers might take the structure), so we can't rule out answers just based on the "direction" of the first word in the answers.

Answer choices

  1. A
    disappointment in scholars' failure Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this say that the author has a positive opinion of Getting Home Alive's innovation (particularly its structure) or that the author acknowledges that its structure could seem confusing?

    Nope. In fact, the author doesn't bring up scholars or earlier works by either Morales, so this answer is unsupported.

  2. B
    expectation that readers in Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem

    (B) Does this say that the author has a positive opinion of Getting Home Alive's innovation (particularly its structure) or that the author acknowledges that its structure could seem confusing?

    Yes! This is a tricky answer because we know, overall, the author has a positive view of each work discussed in the passage. However, the author notes that Getting Home Alive's structure "may seem fragmentary and confusing," suggesting that readers might not see the purpose behind the autobiography's structure (P3, S6). The author also clarifies that this initially confusing structure has a "clear purpose" — it is "fully intentional and carefully designed" (P3, S6). This answer captures that aspect of the author's opinion towards Getting Home Alive, so it's the correct answer. We can justifiably select it and advance straight to the following question.

  3. C
    surprise that academic commentators Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this say that the author has a positive opinion of Getting Home Alive's innovation (particularly its structure) or that the author acknowledges that its structure could seem confusing?

    No. And besides, the author thinks these works are "innovative at many levels," so the author would not be surprised if academics considered them to be significant.

  4. D
    confidence that it will Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this say that the author has a positive opinion of Getting Home Alive's innovation (particularly its structure) or that the author acknowledges that its structure could seem confusing?

    Negative — our anticipation had nothing to do with the reception of these autobiographies. While the author believes these works to be innovative and important, the author doesn't discuss how they will be viewed by others.

  5. E
    insistence that it should Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this say that the author has a positive opinion of Getting Home Alive's innovation (particularly its structure) or that the author acknowledges that its structure could seem confusing?

    No. As with answer (D), the author doesn't discuss the impact of these autobiographies. Just because the author believes the autobiographies are innovative doesn't mean that the author thinks others will feel the same way.

What this tests

Discussion

  • Why E? 1 reply

    Started by farnoushsalimian