PrepTest 135
[lcid:3636] Prep Test 135 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Editorial: One of our
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Argument
Valid or Flawed
Flawed
Question Type
Principle Questions / Strengthen Questions
Stimulus Summary
Critics - The local coverage of the politician’s nephew’s personal problems was inappropriate
Editorial - The info was accurate and ratings were up because people are curious about it, so it was good journalism.
Answer Anticipation
Principle (Strengthen) questions task us with justifying the judgment in the conclusion based on the details in the premises.
Here, the conclusion is that coverage of someone’s personal problems was “good journalism.” That’s based on the reporting being accurate and the ratings being up (showing that people were interested in the information). The correct answer, then, should connect those:
If reporting is accurate and/or people are interested in it, then it’s good journalism.
Answer choices
-
AJournalism deserves to be Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
The Editorial’s conclusion is that certain journalism was good journalism, not that it deserved criticism. -
BAny journalism that intentionally Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
This answer is essentially the negation of what we’re looking for - the argument treats accuracy as justifying a conclusion of “good journalism,” not inaccuracy justifying the opposite conclusion. -
CAny journalism that provides Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
This answer connects the premises of the argument to the conclusion. The coverage of the politician’s nephew’s personal problems was accurate and popular, and this answer establishes that as enough to warrant that journalism being called good journalism. -
DGood journalism will always Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
This answer is tempting! However, it reverses the principle we need. The argument assumes that journalism that gives people what they want is good journalism, and this answer guarantees that good journalism gives people what they want. -
EJournalism that neither satisfies Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
This answer is a negation of what we’re looking for, justifying a conclusion that journalism isn’t good instead of that it is.
What this tests
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.