Conclusion?

Started by shafieiava · started 2020-02-19 01:18 · last activity 2020-02-24 00:00 · 3 replies

I'm having trouble identifying the conclusion here I thought it was the part mentioned in the question stem. Can someone point out the conclusion here and what indicates that it is the conclusion? Thanks in advance.

Replies

  1. shafieiava · 2020-02-19 01:18

    Is the conclusion here - "it probably does"?
  2. Ravi · 2020-02-19 03:08

    @shafieiava, Let's take a look at (A) and (E). (A) says, "trampolines cause injuries to a significant number of people using them" The problem with (A) is that although the first speaker would agree with this statement, the second speaker never addresses how many injuries cause. She only speaks about trampoline-related injuries. Thus, we can't conclude that the two speakers disagree about this statement, so (A) is out. (E) says, "trampoline use is an activity that warrants mandatory professional supervision" (E) captures the physician's conclusion well, and the trampoline enthusiast begins by stating, "I disagree." The two speakers certainly disagree about whether or not professional supervision should be required for trampoline use. Thus, (E) is the correct answer choice. Hope this helps. Let us know if you have any other questions!
  3. shafieiava · 2020-02-24 00:00

    @Ravi it looks like the explanation you gave above is for a different question! I asked about Question 22 on Test 65 section 1 - and the question concerns driving position & safety, not trampolines. Thanks in advance!

Sign in to reply.