PrepTest 133

[lcid:3628] Prep Test 133 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Principle: Even if an Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Strengthen Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    An authentic work of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. While this answer might provide a motive to mislead bidders about the vase, it doesn't establish that motive, and so it falls short of justifying the application of the principle.
  2. B
    Although pottery that is Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer doesn't discuss the beliefs of Healy's at all, so it can't establish they intended to deceive bidders. Outcome doesn't determine intent, so what the bidders did doesn't tell us anything about Healy's motives.
  3. C
    The stated policy of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. While this answer might suggest the vase's description violated policy, it doesn't indicate that it was done so with an intent to deceive.
  4. D
    Some Healy's staff members Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. The beliefs of "some" staff members don't determine the motives behind a given description.
  5. E
    Without consulting anyone with Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Strengthen (Principle)

    Stimulus Summary:
    P: Description labeled as opinion but meant to mislead bidders → Misrepresentation

    A: Healy's catalog disclaims that all descriptions are opinions, but it described a modern repro vase as mid-18th century, so it was a misrepresentation.

    Answer Anticipation:
    The principle establishes a key element making a description—even one labeled an opinion—a misrepresentation: it was meant to mislead. There's no indication in the Application that Healy's meant to mislead anyone with their description of a modern reproduction of a vase as mid-18th century, so to justify that being a misrepresentation, the correct answer will have to bring up that intent.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer strongly suggests that Healy's was attempting to mislead bidders in that they didn't check with experts and were motivated "merely" by a desire to make more money. This answer does the most to establish that misleading motive, thus doing the most to justify the application of the principle.

    Key Takeaway:
    Motives are key to finding the correct answer in most questions that mention them. Make sure to pay attention to this motive—and not just actions or outcomes—when they're mentioned. Someone can take an action that runs counter to their motives, and the best of intentions can lead to the worst of outcomes.

What this tests

Discussion