PrepTest 106
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Topic: Humanities
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- The movie industry has developed a mutually beneficial marketing relationship with the other mass media.
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Origins: Hollywood star system, in which actors were under contract to a movie studio, was a result of the public’s interest in actors’ private lives (second sentence)
- Public relations agents informed press about stars’ lives, and press promoted movies on the basis of this information (third sentence)
- Press benefited financially from this, because the public went to the movies based on their publicity and found that movies were created by talented storytellers (fourth sentence)
- Author’s attitude: “pervasive and influential” (first sentence); “feed into and off of” (first sentence); “whetting the public’s appetite” (third sentence); “additional virtue” (third sentence); “art of storytelling” (third sentence); “cultural cross-fertilization” (fourth sentence)
- Origins: Hollywood star system, in which actors were under contract to a movie studio, was a result of the public’s interest in actors’ private lives (second sentence)
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- Movies and mass media are interdependent and sustain themselves with the notion that there are always movies worth promoting.
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Other media do most of movie promotion for the studios (third sentence)
- Many media outlets are already promoting movies, so there is a ready-made audience already interested (fourth sentence)
- TV, radio, magazines, product ads (third sentence)
- Author’s attitude: “mushroomed” (first sentence), “intricately interdependent” (first sentence), “sustains itself” (second sentence); “vast portion” (third sentence); “good business” (fourth sentence)
- Other media do most of movie promotion for the studios (third sentence)
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Problem: mass media promotion model has made movies less emotionally satisfying
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Need to generate publicity has affected creation of movies (first sentence)
- Studio execs choose subject matter and actors instead of writers and directors (second sentence)
- Movies are made with an eye toward publicity rather than good art (fourth sentence)
- This trend is likely to continue because it makes more money than producing emotionally engaging movies (fifth sentence)
- Author’s attitude: “new danger” (fourth sentence), “audience’s curiosity” (fourth sentence), “engaging experience” (fourth sentence), “on the strength of media publicity” (fifth sentence), “word of mouth” (fifth sentence), “intimate relationship” (fifth sentence), “lost” (fifth sentence), “affect audiences emotionally” (sixth sentence), “increasingly rare” (sixth sentence)
- Need to generate publicity has affected creation of movies (first sentence)
Main Point: The system by which the mass media promote movies has created incentives for the film industry to make films that are easy to publicize rather than emotionally engaging.
Key Lines?Paragraph 1, Sentence 4 (P1 S4) - Mass media benefits by promoting movies
P2 S2 - Mass media constantly promoting something
P3 S1 - System of mass media promotion has affected creation of films
P3 S4 - Incentives to produce easily-promotable films rather than good ones
P3 S6 - Films that affect audiences emotionally becoming rare
Meta-Structure?Importance of Subject: This passage describes why the system by which the mass media came to promote movies is important. The author describes the origins of this system in the 1920s and traces the ways in which the system has grown and shaped the film industry. According to the author, the dependence of the film industry on the mass media promotion machine, and movie studios’ focus on turning the largest profit possible, have led them to focus on creating films that generate a large publicity buzz rather than films that engage emotionally with their audience. The author sees this as a problem and implies that the quality of films has suffered over the years. Moreover, the author says, this trend will likely continue into the future..
The minor Meta-Structure of this passage is Causality. It is the monetary incentive to create films that are easily-promotable that drives the film industry, the author argues, rather than the artistic motive to create films that connect emotionally with their audiences. Back in the 1920s, when the mass media just happened to begin promoting films because people were interested in the lives of movie stars, studios were still interested in creating films that could be considered vital pieces of popular art, but now, when the film industry and the mass media are so interdependent, studios focus on creating films that get viewers into seats just based on the publicity rather than on the content of the film.
Last Thoughts?This passage is rather hard to classify, because the author clearly points out a problem, but they don’t offer any solutions. The passage traces how the problem of the film industry’s dependence on the mass media arose, and how that problem leads to lower-quality movies, but it does not offer any ways of fixing the issue. This means it can’t really be classified as a Problem/Solution passage. It is simply an explanatory passage where the author has a definite viewpoint that they support using evidence.
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strategy Overview
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
Adiscourages the work of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
(A) Does this answer choice line up with our anticipation of the author’s warning about mass-media promotion of films?
No. The author refers to the fact that filmmakers attempt to draw the largest possible audiences to their films in P3 S3, but mass-media promotion of films is designed to do just that: draw the largest number of people into movie theaters as possible. Far from discouraging filmmakers who want to amass a large audience, mass-media promotion of films actually encourages this practice.
-
Bdiscourages the critical review Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
(B) Does this answer choice line up with our anticipation of the author’s warning about mass-media promotion of films?
No. This answer choice is totally without support in the passage. The author doesn’t mention critics or their reviews of movies anywhere in the passage. So in a specific reference question like this, an answer choice that mentions critical review can’t be the right choice.
-
Cencourages the production of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
(C) Does this answer choice line up with our anticipation of the author’s warning about mass-media promotion of films?
Yes. This answer choice matches our anticipation exactly, and is right in line with the author’s main point about the consequences of mass-media promotion of films for the movie industry. In fact, this answer choice even uses some of the same language as P3 S4, the very sentence we identified as including the word “danger.” So we can be confident that this is the right answer.
-
Dencourages decisions to make Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
(D) Does this answer choice line up with our anticipation of the author’s warning about mass-media promotion of films?
No. This answer is also totally without support in the passage. The author refers in P1 S2 to the fact that information about actors could be used to promote the films they appeared in, but nowhere in the passage does the author say that the content of films paralleled the lives of the actors.
-
Eencourages cynicism among potential Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
(E) Does this answer choice line up with our anticipation of the author’s warning about mass-media promotion of films?
Not quite. This is almost a contender for the right answer choice, because it can be viewed as a natural extension of the point the author is making in the passage as a whole.
That is to say, in the ‘20s, studios promoted films in the mass media because the public wanted to know about the actors, but when the audiences got to the theater, they found that films were entertaining and delivered on their own merits (P1 S3). Today, the author says, films are geared toward generating publicity but don’t deliver as far as being emotionally engaging (P3 S5). However, film studios are likely to continue with the mass media promotion model because it generates greater profits than any other (P3 S6). If all that is the case, it is likely that audiences will eventually wake up to the fact that media publicity is mostly hype and the films being promoted aren’t worth all the buildup, which is basically what the answer choice says.
However, this question stem is asking about what the author actually says about the danger of mass media promotion of films rather than what the author implies or what the author hints could be the case in the future. So answer choice (C), in this case, is the right answer.
What this tests
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.