confusion about answer not paralleling
Started by
Hanfan
· started 2022-09-29 19:43
· last activity 2022-10-05 18:32
· 1 reply
the correct answer does not have the 'not' that the original argument has. it says a->b rather than a-> not b. maybe i misinterpreted it. let me know thanks!
-
Emil-Kunkin
· 2022-10-05 18:32
Hi Hanfan,
I think this comes down to whether one diagrams limits on free speech as
LFS or Not FS
Ultimately, we can choose to frame things as a negative or a positive (e.g. rain could be R or Not Sun), and these are logically equivalent statements.
Sign in to reply.