PrepTest 106
[lcid:3520] Prep Test 106 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
For any given ticket
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Argument
Valid or Flawed
Flawed
Question Type
Flawed Parallel Reasoning Questions
Stimulus Summary
Each lottery ticket will probably lose, so it’s reasonable that no one will win.
Answer Anticipation
We know that this is an invalid argument because, well, people win the lottery. But what is the flaw here?
Well, one way to look at it is this. What are the odds that a lottery ticket will win? 1/1000. But as you start to look at all the lottery tickets, the question isn’t whether a given one will win, but rather whether one of a lot of them will win. While the odds for an individual ticket is 1/1000, the odds for one out of, say, 2000 tickets winning is actually quite high (99.999999817%, if you’re curious)!
In other words, this argument is going from what is true of an individual ticket, to what is true of a group of tickets, making this a Part to Whole flaw. Let’s find an answer that makes the same jump.
Answer choices
-
AIt is reasonable to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
The odds of one card drawn being an ace is low, so you’ll never draw an ace. That’s the same jump from the odds in a single instance to the odds in a lot of instances, so this is the correct answer. -
BWhen the chances of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
This argument’s conclusion restates the premise, only flipping it around. It’s also about something that’s statistically very likely to happen, not unlikely. -
CIt is unreasonable to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
This answer is similar to (B), in that the premise and conclusion more or less restate each other. -
DIt is reasonable to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Another answer where the conclusion is more or less a restatement of the premise (since if a coin was flipped 1000 times and it was tails each time, then the last time it was flipped it was tails). -
EFor any given group Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
This answer applies what is true of a group to an individual - that’s a Whole to Part jump, not a Part to Whole one.
What this tests
Discussion
-
H's statement: a Biconditional? 1 reply
Started by Mazen
-
Help 2 replies
Started by Batman