PrepTest 102

[lcid:3507] Prep Test 102 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Sociologist: Research shows, contrary Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Cause & Effect / Weaken Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Some people who have Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. The stimulus compares the average of the two groups, so "some" outliers won't undermine the argument.
  2. B
    Most people who have Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. Without tying this into happiness, this answer is out of scope.
  3. C
    Most people who have Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. The conclusion is about maximal happiness—"as happy as possible." As such, being "reasonably happy" is out of scope.
  4. D
    Most people who have Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Weaken

    Stimulus Summary:
    Research - Other things equal, people with pets are less happy than those without
    Conclusion - If you want to be your happiest, think about skipping a pet

    Answer Anticipation:
    It can be a little difficult to see the flaw in this argument, but whenever a premise is talking about average/"other things equal," you should start to think about a common flaw associated with averages—they don't apply to individuals.

    While, on average, people with pets may be less happy than those without pets, it could be the case that people who have pets would, individually, be more unhappy without the pets. It's possible that pet owners are naturally less happy than people who don't own pets, and those pets give them a bit of a boost to be happier than they'd otherwise be.

    Note that this doesn't change the stimulus—there, it says all other things being equal, so it doesn't include natural happiness levels or pet ownership. And, again, it's possible that pet owners are happier than they'd be without pets, even if they're less happy than non-pet owners. Since the argument ignores this possibility, let's find an answer establishing it.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer establishes that pets make pet owners happier. Regardless of whether they're as happy as their non-pet-owning counterparts, these individuals are mostly happier because of the pets, undermining the conclusion that people who want to be as happy as possible should avoid getting a pet.

    Key Takeaway:
    When an argument talks about averages, it can't be applied to individuals.
  5. E
    All people who have Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. Feeling unhappy at times doesn't determine overall levels of happiness. Someone who is happy-go-lucky can still get sad when they stub their toe!

What this tests

Discussion