Lucky Deduction?

Started by AndrewArabie · started 2022-10-13 01:12 · last activity 2022-10-17 00:15 · 2 replies

One rule can be represented: N-->L Another can be represented: Q-->K Both have a common variable with the "either, but not both" rules above. I combined them to read: N--> not P--> L Q--> not J--> K I got the right answer because I figured it had something to do with this deduction, but I don't know why. I could have ran through several scenarios and did it the long way but I took a chance with this deduction. Did I get lucky or can the answer be derived from this chain alone? If it can, how is that so? I figure if I understood the logic behind this I can use it more often.

Replies

  1. AndrewArabie · 2022-10-13 01:23

    I made the deduction that Q would also be out and that there was only room left for one more to be out so I figured it had something to do with the chain I made above
  2. Emil-Kunkin · 2022-10-17 00:15

    Hi Andrew, good job putting rules together! You absolutely can and should hunt for cases when you can do this, specifically when a variable is mentioned in more than one rule

Sign in to reply.