PrepTest 109
[lcid:3535] Prep Test 109 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Advertisement: Among popular automobiles,
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Errors in Reasoning Questions
Answer choices
-
AIt draws a general Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Errors in Reasoning
Stimulus Summary:
There are hundreds of Sturdimade drivers who have driven their cars over 100,000 miles, so Sturdimades are reliable.
Answer Anticipation:
The conclusion here draws its conclusion about the reliability of Sturdimade cars by looking at the owners who have Sturdimades that have lasted for over 100,000 miles. Those cars are certainly reliable, but there's no indication that they're representative of all Sturdimades.
Maybe millions of Sturdimades are sold every year, and only hundreds of them have made it to 100,000 miles. If that's the case, then they're not looking all that reliable!
The short version? This argument is based on a sample of a few hundred who signed up for a club designed to prove the conclusion, and that sample is not shown to be large enough to draw the conclusion and it's more or less guaranteed to not be representative.
Answer Explanation:
This answer highlights the Sampling flaw present in the stimulus. It bases a conclusion about reliability on those who signed up for a club requiring that your Sturdimade be reliable. That's a skewed sample and possibly too small to be reliable, so this answer is correct.
Key Takeaway:
Whenever a sample is "opt in"—here, by signing up for the "long distance" club—it's very likely unrepresentative. A sample generally needs to be random in order to be representative. -
BIts conclusion merely restates Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. The conclusion is that Sturdimades are reliable, and the evidence is that at least a few hundred have been driven over 100,000 miles. That's not simply restating the premise—it's using a sample to back it up (even if that sample is skewed). -
CIt fails to clarify Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. "Reliability" is the key term here, and there's no ambiguity—it is used to mean that the car will hold up after being driven for many, many miles. -
DThe evidence given to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. Sturdimades that last a long time go to support a conclusion about their reliability. -
EIt treats popular opinion Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. The argument doesn't bring up popular opinion about the reliability of Sturdimades—it brings up specific examples of the car lasting a long time.
What this tests
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.