PrepTest 112
[lcid:3547] Prep Test 112 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
A government ought to
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Argument
Valid or Flawed
Flawed
Question Type
Strengthen with Sufficient Premise Questions
Stimulus Summary
Free speech is good for national health, which is good for the people, so the government should protect it.
Answer Anticipation
When dealing with Strengthen with Sufficient Premise questions, it’s frequently best to start by looking at the conclusion to see if any new concepts are brought up. When that’s the case, in order to make the conclusion follow logically from the premises, the correct answer needs to connect that new concept to something established in the premises.
Here, the conclusion is about what the government ought to do, but the premises never prescribe any actions from the government. As such, the correct answer is going to need to establish that the government should do something - in this case, protect and encourage free speech.
That latter concept is how the argument does connect to the premises - they’re about free speech. What the argument proves is that free speech is in the best interest of people. So to connect this with the conclusion, we should look for an answer establishing that the government should protect and encourage anything that’s in the best interest of its people.
Answer choices
-
AAn activity that is Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
According to the premises, free speech is in the best interests of the people. This answer says that it therefore should be protected and encouraged by a nation’s government - as the conclusion states. Since this answer justifies the conclusion on the basis of the premises offered, it’s the correct answer. -
BBasic, inalienable rights of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
The stimulus never establishes free speech as a basic and inalienable right of the people, so this answer doesn’t necessarily apply. -
CAn activity that helps Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
There’s no indication that free speech helps a government to govern, so this answer is out of scope. -
DA government ought to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Free speech is established as conducive to a healthy nation, but it isn’t established that that’s in the interests of this government - maybe they want an unhealthy nation that they can rob of resources! -
EUniversal human rights that Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Similar to (B), there’s no indication that free speech is a universal human right (though it is in the best interest of the people), so this answer is similarly out of scope.
What this tests
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.