PrepTest 104

[lcid:3514] Prep Test 104 LSAT — Reading Comp — S3 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 8-14  .        Personal names are generally regarded by  . European thinkers in two major ways, both of which Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Social Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • European thinkers generally think of personal names as lacking semantic content, while other societies, like the Hopi, assemble personal names as miniature poetic compositions.
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • European perspectives on personal names lack semantic content (first sentence)
      • Two major perspectives on personal names:
        • John Stuart Mill: distinguish individuals from one another (second sentence)
        • Claude Levi-Strauss: classify people socially (second sentence)
      • Interpretation and understanding of personal names in societies that imbue them with more significance than Europeans has been lacking (third sentence)
        • Hopi: names refer to historical or ritual events (fourth sentence)
          • Names not only confer identity and place people in society, but they are poetic compositions (fourth-fifth sentences)
        • Author’s attitude: “both of which deny” (first sentence); “instruments of social classification” (second sentence); “neglected” (third sentence); “confer an identity” (fourth sentence); “type of poetic composition” (fifth sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Hopi names have meaning because they reflect the ritual initiations the person has gone through.
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Hopis receive several names during ritual initiations (first sentence)
      • Occasions are birth, childhood, and puberty (second sentence)
      • Names are conferred by adult of another clan (third sentence), and can combine a person’s characteristics with the animal of the name-giver’s clan (third sentence)
    • Author’s attitude: “sometimes combining characteristics” (third sentence); “name might translate” (fourth sentence); “reflects” (fourth sentence)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • However, Hopi names are usually more complex and poetic, reflecting events and rituals that are not discernible in the literal translation of the name.
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • More often, names refer to events or rituals (first sentence)
      • A Lizard clan member is named “beautifully ascended” by a member of the Badger clan because the Badger clan performs a ceremony evoking the ascension of spirits (second-fifth sentences)
    • Hopi personal names evoke a condensed image, which, similar to Western Apache place names, can be seen as poems (sixth sentence)
    • Author’s attitude: “not apparent” (first sentence); “tells nothing” (third sentence); “splendid colors and movements” (sixth sentence); “condensed image” (seventh sentence); “tiny imagist poems” (seventh sentence)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Hopi personal names indicate social positions and individual identity, but they are also aesthetic compositions that produce delight.
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Hopi names do several things at the same time (first sentence)
      • Confer identity and indirectly indicate social relationships (second sentence)
      • Are poetic texts as well with aesthetic beauty (third sentence)
    • Hopi names debunk Mill’s contention that names don’t have meaning and Levi-Strauss’s contention that names only indicate social standing (fourth sentence)
    • Author’s attitude: “do several things simultaneously” (first sentence); “equally important” (second sentence); “poetic quality” (second sentence); “aesthetic delight: (second sentence); “opposed” (third sentence); “beauty and significance” (fourth sentence)

Main Point: Typical European views that personal names lack meaning except to confer identity and indicate social position are inadequate to describe the functions of names in cultures like that of the Hopi, where personal names refer to events in a poetically evocative and semantically significant way. 

Key Lines?

Paragraph 1, Sentence 2 (P1 S2) - European views of personal names (Mill and Levi-Strauss)

P1 S3 - Author’s criticism of both European views

P1 S5 - Hopi names do not conform to either European view

P3 S7 - Hopi names, like Western Apache place names, are miniature poems

P4 S3 - Hopi names subvert Mill’s view and Levi-Strauss’s view

Meta-Structure?

Criticizing a Viewpoint: This passage uses a Criticizing a Viewpoint Meta-Structure. The author begins by laying out the two viewpoints they intend to criticize: John Stuart Mill’s contention that personal names lack meaning except to individuate persons and Claude Levi-Strauss’s contention that personal names simply indicate social status. Both views, the author says, deny that personal names have any semantic content or significance. The author then goes on to discuss the functions performed by Hopi personal names, which they say defy both Mill’s and Levi-Strauss’s views. Hopi names, according to the author, have semantic content in that they recall important rituals and events, indicate personal characteristics, indirectly indicate social relationships, and function as miniature evocative poems. All of these characteristics prove, the author contends, that the popular European views that personal names have no semantic significance is wrong.

The minor Meta-Structure evident in this passage is Comparison. It is by comparison to the popular European views of Mill and Levi-Strauss that the author defines the functions performed by Hopi personal names. And it is the European views that the author compares, to their disadvantage, with Hopi views on the formulation and poetic potential of personal names.

The author’s viewpoint is prominent throughout this passage. It is the author making the argument against the European views of personal names and for the Native American views; they don’t speak through “critics” or other people. The clarity afforded by this approach is helpful in tracing the various arguments being made throughout the passage.

Last Thoughts?

This passage wears its heart on its sleeve. Two viewpoints are put forward, evidence is presented that disproves those views, and a conclusion is drawn based on the evidence. The focus in this passage is not on coming up with a comprehensive definition of personal names or a list of all the functions they can perform, but on indicating that the European views presented at the beginning of the passage are inadequate to cover the functions of personal names in all cultures.

Question prompt

Which one of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Social Science

Strategy Overview

Refer to notes or what you highlighted/underlined to locate where the passage discusses Levi-Strauss’s view of the function of personal names, and refer to the relevant part of the passage as needed to find that answer choice that must be true.

Answer Anticipation

For questions that ask us to find a specific detail mentioned in the passage, quickly finding and reviewing that piece of information is paramount. That is why we make brief notes describing the role of each paragraph and highlight or underline definitions and the minor Meta-Structures — doing so helps us find the salient information efficiently and reliably. Once we review that part of the passage, we can look through the answer choices to see which one is best supported by what we reviewed.Here, the question asks about a function accorded to personal names under Levi-Strauss’s view. Levi-Strauss’s view was discussed in P1 S2, which states that he saw names as “instruments of social classification.” So names are somehow indicative of social status and standing, according to Levi-Strauss. Let’s look for this idea in the answer choices.

Answer choices

  1. A
    Some parents select their Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice recall Levi-Strauss’s view that personal names indicate the bearer’s social status or standing?

    No. Whether or not parents choose names from books doesn’t speak to whether those names indicate their children’s social status or standing, so this answer choice does not match our anticipation.

  2. B
    Some parents wait to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this answer choice recall Levi-Strauss’s view that personal names indicate the bearer’s social status or standing?

    No. Looks and personality are not traits that have anything to do with a person’s social status or standing, so this is not the right answer choice.

  3. C
    Some parents name their Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice recall Levi-Strauss’s view that personal names indicate the bearer’s social status or standing?

    No. One’s friends may have something to do with one’s social standing, but just choosing a child’s personal name to recall a friend doesn’t signal to anyone what their social standing is. Also, naming a child after a famous person doesn’t indicate that child’s social standing either.

  4. D
    Some family members have Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this answer choice recall Levi-Strauss’s view that personal names indicate the bearer’s social status or standing?

    No. The fact that some family members have no parts of their names in common doesn’t speak to whether names are chosen based on social status/standing or not. This answer is a non sequitur.

  5. E
    Some family names originated Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem

    (E) Does this answer choice recall Levi-Strauss’s view that personal names indicate the bearer’s social status or standing?

    Yes. One’s occupation is indeed indicative of one’s social standing, so bearing a name that is based on your ancestors’ occupation does signal to others what your social standing is or at least what your ancestors’ was at one time. So, this answer choice is a correct example of Levi-Strauss’s conception of the function performed by personal names.

What this tests

Discussion

View all discussions Start a discussion