B versus D

Hi @shafieiava, No problem! This question is asking us to weaken the author's argument in the passage. So, let's take a second to summarize the argument we are trying to weaken. Critics say Kingston's literary works lack precedent. However, they overlook Kingston's connection to the longstanding Chinese tradition of talk-story, an oral form of narrative that Kingston's works resemble. Let's talk about answer choice B first. In B, we are told: Most Chinese American writers' work is very different from Kingstons. This doesn't suggest that Kingston is somehow not connected to talk-story, which is what we would look for to weaken this argument. What the work of most Chinese American writers' is like isn't a relevant consideration for trying to weaken the case in point. Let's take a look at D now. It says: China Men is for the most part atypical of Kingston's works. The argument is that Kingston, by the means of talk-story, is connected to precedent in her literary culture. However, if China Men (the example the passage uses to illustrate and emphasize this connection) were just a one-off piece, that doesn't strengthen the idea that her works are connected to talk-story. We want to know that her work collectively has a connection to talk story to be able to say her writing style has that precedent. If we know China Men is connected to talk-story, but then are told China Men isn't like her other works, then that weakens the author's argument that Kingston's works have a literary precedent via talk-story. Hope this helps!