PrepTest 127
[lcid:3606] Prep Test 127 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S3
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Gardener: Researchers encourage us
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: D
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Main Point Questions
Answer choices
-
ATo the extent that Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This answer reflects the concession or point of agreement between the Gardener and the Researchers before she pivots to her opinion of their recommendation about weeds, so it's not really a part of her argument. -
BAllowing certain kinds of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. This answer reflects one of the possible downsides of growing the recommended weeds and is thus support for the conclusion that that recommendation is premature. -
CAllowing the right kinds Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. This answer reflects the conclusion/recommendation of the Researchers, not the Gardener. -
DWe should be cautious Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Valid
Question Type:
Main Point
Stimulus Summary:
Researchers: Let some weeds grow in your garden to repel caterpillars.
Gardener: Those weeds could hurt the soil and attract other pests, so the Researchers' advice is premature.
Answer Anticipation:
The Gardener starts her argument by bringing up the advice of some Researchers. From there, she pivots to a concession/point of agreement ("While . . . ") and then states her opinion of the Researchers' advice—it's premature.
Statements that follow a pivot/concession are often conclusions, and the author's opinion of an opposing point is almost always the main point of an argument. Therefore, this statement is almost certainly the main point of the argument.
That's backed up by the following statement bringing up the reasoning behind thinking that the advice is premature—we don't know if there are downsides to the practice. Let's find an answer stating that the advice to grow certain weeds in a garden is premature.
Answer Explanation:
This answer reflects the Gardener's opinion of the Researchers' recommendation—a premature recommendation is one that should be approached with caution. Since this answer states the author's opinion of the opposing point, it's the main point of the argument.
Key Takeaway:
An author's opinion of an opposing point is almost always the main point of an argument. -
EWe should be skeptical Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. Tempting! A premature view should be viewed with skepticism, so that part of the answer is fine. However, the Gardener doesn't question whether the weeds will keep caterpillars out of gardens, as this answer states. Instead, she seems to acknowledge that the weeds can accomplish that, but that they might have other downsides and attract other kinds of insects.
What this tests
Discussion
-
No setup, multiple requests 1 reply
Started by skrh
-
Started by JessicaR
-
setup 4 replies
Started by spruisy