PrepTest 127
[lcid:3605] Prep Test 127 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S2
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Dietitian: High consumption of
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strengthen with Necessary Premise Questions
Answer choices
-
AFresh fruits and vegetables Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. The relevant comparison is between potassium levels in fresh vs. frozen/canned fruits/veggies. -
BFood processing businesses often Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. There doesn't need to be more sodium in these fruits/veggies for the argument to work, just less potassium. -
CPotassium is the only Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. Even if other minerals protect against sodium, they may be significantly rarer or harder to get into the diet than potassium, and thus the recommendation could still hold. -
DPotassium in fruits and Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. The argument is only about maintaining cardiac health, so if fresh fruits/vegetables have side effects unrelated to heart health, the argument can still work. This answer is out of scope in bringing up other health issues that could stem from eating fresh fruits/veggies. -
EFresh fruits and vegetables Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Strengthen with Necessary Premise
Stimulus Summary:
Sodium causes heart disease. Potassium counteracts these effects.
Goal: Protect heart while eating sodium
Method: Avoid canned/frozen fruits/veggies and eat fresh ones.
Answer Anticipation:
This argument establishes a few causal relationships. First, sodium causes heart disease. Second, potassium protects the heart from sodium. The Dietitian then establishes an interesting goal—not just to protect the heart, but also to keep eating sodium. In order to accomplish that, based on the premises, one should eat potassium. However, instead of concluding that, the Dietitian starts talking about eating fresh fruits/veggies rather than frozen/canned fruit/veggies. For that recommendation to make sense, there must be more potassium in fresh fruit/veggies compared to the frozen/canned alternatives.
Answer Explanation:
This answer draws the connection that justifies the Dietitian's recommendation. If fresh fruits/veggies don't have more potassium than canned/frozen alternatives, then there's no reason to recommend that shift for people who want to protect their heart from sodium.
Key Takeaway:
Goal/recommendation arguments are strongly related to causal arguments, as a means for achieving a goal is necessarily going to rely on a cause/effect relationship. Framing questions through this lens can make it a lot easier to handle these concepts and see where the gap in the logic is!
What this tests
Discussion
-
Answer choice A 1 reply
Started by shafieiava
-
I had a hard time with this one 1 reply
Started by knoxygirl