Why not E
Started by
Nativeguy
· started 2023-06-30 20:01
· last activity 2023-07-06 02:09
· 2 replies
Author literally states
the prestige of the legal
(35) institution requires that jurisprudence treat the
. tradition as if it were, in essence, the application of
. known rules to objectively determined facts. To
. suggest otherwise would be dispiriting for the student
. and demoralizing for the public.
-
Nativeguy
· 2023-06-30 20:21
Honestly, why not D as well ?
passage states
The notion of jurisprudence as a
. system of norms or principles deemphasizes history
. in favor of the coherence of a system. In this view,
. the past of the system is conceived as no more than
(30) the continuous succession of its states of presence.
-
Emil-Kunkin
· 2023-07-06 02:09
Hi, the whole second paragraph is outlining a view that the author seems to disagree with. It is a critique of the academic study of jurisprudence that neglects to understand common law as an outgrowth of the long historical view.
Sign in to reply.