PrepTest 131

[lcid:3620] Prep Test 131 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S1 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

The typological theory of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Errors in Reasoning Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    the argument does not Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. If a theory is wrong in a key way, then it doesn't matter if it's correct in others—it's an incorrect theory.
  2. B
    the argument confuses a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. The argument does establish an inability to interbreed as a sufficient condition for species distinction, but it doesn't then treat it as necessary.
  3. C
    the argument, in its Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Errors in Reasoning

    Stimulus Summary:
    Typological theory - Species are grouped based on physical characteristics
    Shortcoming - There are species that are physically identical but can't interbreed
    Mainstream theory - Animals that can't interbreed are different species
    Conclusion - Typological theory is wrong

    Answer Anticipation:
    Any of these science passages can be difficult to follow, so it's usually a good idea to do two things. First, keep the theories straight. Second, work backwards from the conclusion.

    So first, the theories. There are two here—the Typological Theory, and the Mainstream Theory. The Typological Theory is featured in the conclusion, and it's stated to be wrong.

    Why? Because it can't account for "sibling species"—species that are physically identical but can't interbreed. Why are they a problem for the Typological Theory? Because the Mainstream Theory says that species that can't interbreed are separate species, but the Typological Theory would classify these as the same species.

    But wait—the author is throwing out a theory because it contradicts another theory. There's no evidence that the Mainstream Theory is correct, however! It's not established that species that can't interbreed are separate species—just that the Mainstream Theory states that.

    This answer is similar to question #14 in this section in that it assumes one theory is right over a contradictory theory. However, without presenting information supporting the Mainstream Theory's definition of a species over the Typological Theory's, this argument is flawed.

    Answer Explanation:
    The argument assumes that the Mainstream Theory's belief that species that can't interbreed are separate species is correct, and thus the Typological Theory must be "unacceptable" because it can't account for that. However, that assumes the truth of the Mainstream Theory without providing reason to believe it, and so the argument is flawed in the manner suggested by this answer choice.

    Key Takeaway:
    Whenever there are competing theories or experts, see if the author gives a reason to believe one over the other. Often, the author will prioritize one without explaining why.
  4. D
    the argument takes a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer doesn't highlight a flaw—pointing out an error in a theory is enough to show the theory is false.
  5. E
    the argument does not Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. It doesn't matter why they can't interbreed, just whether that means they're not the same species.

What this tests

Discussion