PrepTest 128

[lcid:3608] Prep Test 128 LSAT — Reading Comp — S1 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 14-21  .        As the twentieth century draws to a close, we are  . learning to see the extent Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Social Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Generalization and an Example
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Generalization - Human biases play a large role in the creation of the unified national identities we construct from our cultural pasts
    • Example - Greek civilization had Egyptian/African/Eastern influences, but European scholars stripped that away and focused on European influences

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • A general example, a specific example of it - tradition
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • General example - Using “tradition” to exert imperial power by projecting it into past
    • Specific example - Queen Victoria’s reign in India celebrated with traditional jamborees

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Examples (general and specific) - Colonized fighters
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Native cultures construct idealized image of past to motivate fight for freedom
    • France/Algeria - What was Algeria like before French colonization?

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Modern trend; Paradox; Conclusion
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Trend - Colonized societies are independent, but imperial attitudes remain
    • Paradox - Very aware of influences that cross borders on culture, but “nationalist dogma” persists
    • Cultures include more foreign influences than they exclude

Main Point: While nationalist dogma and imperial tendencies create images of national identities that are monolithic, the reality is that cultures include far more foreign influences than they exclude.

Key Lines?

Lines 1-9 - A generalization/new view of history

Line 9 - An example is introduced

Line 22 - Another example is introduced (with a specific version of it starting in Line 35)

Lines 40-43 - Another set of examples introduced

Lines 53-62 - A paradox

Lines 62-65 - The Author wraps her argument up

Meta-Structure?

Generalization/Examples - The passage begins with a Generalization (Lines 1-9). There, she states that studies have shown us that our biases shape how we view the past, and in particular how we construct national identities. She then hops into an example of how such biases have shaped the way that Greek civilization has been viewed by scholars. At this point, she could have easily shifted to another point, but instead she hops into another example in Paragraph 2, and similar constructions in Paragraph 3, backing up that this passage is meant to show examples backing up a generalization. When this Meta-Structure is present, the Generalization is the main point, and, here, Paragraph 4 clarifies what that generalization is. The Author concludes by stating that biases lead to “nationalist dogma” saying nations are unitary, monolithic, or autonomous, but cultures include more foreign influences than they exclude. Since this generalization is backed up by the examples the Author brings up throughout the passage, it’s the main point.

Resolving a Debate - The Author brings up two ways to view history - that of certain scholars and nationalists, who take a monolithic view of society; and to see the various influences that every culture has. She sides with the latter, which is reflected in our Generalization, above.

Paradox/Resolution - The Author brings up a paradox in Line 57. This paradox is that all nationally defined cultures (e.g., American) have a tendency to view themselves as monolithic, but we’re more aware than ever that this isn’t the case. This paradox very much lines up with the Resolving a Debate Meta-Structure, and the one side of the paradox lines up with the Author’s view that national cultures are an amalgamation of many influences, so this answer reinforces the prior Meta-Structures while also introducing new language we can see in big picture questions (“paradox,” “unexpected,” and other language that reflects this concept).

Last Thoughts?

The general example/specific example pattern in Paragraphs 2 and 3 are pretty interesting, and it would be important to have a view on both the general and specific in order to find information needed for the questions, so you should have notes for both levels in each relevant paragraph.

Question prompt

The "purveyors of nationalist Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Social Science

Strategy Overview

Review the viewpoint of the “purveyors of nationalist dogma” from Line 62, then find an answer that lines up with that viewpoint

Answer Anticipation

Line 62 shows up in Paragraph 4, and that’s where the Author discusses a modern trend, a paradox, and a conclusion. We also know from our initial analysis that there’s an alternative viewpoint here - that of the purveyors of nationalist dogma that this question asks about. So we can start by knowing that these individuals don’t line up with the Author’s viewpoint.Looking at Line 62, we see that it belongs in a sentence starting in Line 56. That’s where the Author brings up the paradox, which references the previous sentence (“At the same time”). So reviewing the paradox, we see that the Author says that all nations aspire to sovereignty in a way that is reflected in their cultural identity, and yet we are now - more than ever - aware that all cultures are influenced by internal and external forces. This paradox then pivots to tell us that the purveyors of nationalist dogma from the question stem make “claims to the contrary.”What would a claim to the contrary be? That national identities/cultures aren’t the result of both internal and external forces. That makes sense with the phrase “nationalist dogma,” which would take a dogmatic stance on nationalism - a nation is a strongly defined entity that is defined by itself, not outside sources. Let’s find an answer reflecting this viewpoint.

Answer choices

  1. A
    Colonized nations should not Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Be careful here! It’s easy to associate the purveyors of natioanlist dogma with the imperialists. However, what the passage actually says is that they claim national identities aren’t defined by multiple cultural influences. As such, if anything, they might argue that nations should work to regain their historical cultures and purge all outside influences!

  2. B
    Imperial cultures should incorporate Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) (Lines 56-61) The exact opposite, in fact! The purveyors of nationalist dogma believe that national identities and cultures shouldn’t partake of many social and cultural domains, some of which cross borders.

  3. C
    The cultural traditions of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem

    (C) (Lines 56-61) The Author states that we’re now more aware than ever of how cultural identities are defined by social and cultural influences both internal and external, but that purveyors of nationalist dogma claim the contrary. So those purveyors believe that national identities shouldn’t include external influences, as this answer choice states. It is therefore correct.

  4. D
    A country's cultural identity Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) (Lines 56-61) This is the viewpoint of the Author, and the purveyors of nationalist dogmamake “claims to the contrary,” so we can eliminate this answer.

  5. E
    National histories are created Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) (Lines 53-56) This is the viewpoint put forward by the Author earlier in the passage, and we know that the purveyors of natioalist dogma take a contrary stance, so we can rule this answer out.

What this tests

Discussion