PrepTest 128

[lcid:3608] Prep Test 128 LSAT — Reading Comp — S1 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 14-21  .        As the twentieth century draws to a close, we are  . learning to see the extent Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Social Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Generalization and an Example
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Generalization - Human biases play a large role in the creation of the unified national identities we construct from our cultural pasts
    • Example - Greek civilization had Egyptian/African/Eastern influences, but European scholars stripped that away and focused on European influences

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • A general example, a specific example of it - tradition
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • General example - Using “tradition” to exert imperial power by projecting it into past
    • Specific example - Queen Victoria’s reign in India celebrated with traditional jamborees

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Examples (general and specific) - Colonized fighters
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Native cultures construct idealized image of past to motivate fight for freedom
    • France/Algeria - What was Algeria like before French colonization?

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Modern trend; Paradox; Conclusion
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Trend - Colonized societies are independent, but imperial attitudes remain
    • Paradox - Very aware of influences that cross borders on culture, but “nationalist dogma” persists
    • Cultures include more foreign influences than they exclude

Main Point: While nationalist dogma and imperial tendencies create images of national identities that are monolithic, the reality is that cultures include far more foreign influences than they exclude.

Key Lines?

Lines 1-9 - A generalization/new view of history

Line 9 - An example is introduced

Line 22 - Another example is introduced (with a specific version of it starting in Line 35)

Lines 40-43 - Another set of examples introduced

Lines 53-62 - A paradox

Lines 62-65 - The Author wraps her argument up

Meta-Structure?

Generalization/Examples - The passage begins with a Generalization (Lines 1-9). There, she states that studies have shown us that our biases shape how we view the past, and in particular how we construct national identities. She then hops into an example of how such biases have shaped the way that Greek civilization has been viewed by scholars. At this point, she could have easily shifted to another point, but instead she hops into another example in Paragraph 2, and similar constructions in Paragraph 3, backing up that this passage is meant to show examples backing up a generalization. When this Meta-Structure is present, the Generalization is the main point, and, here, Paragraph 4 clarifies what that generalization is. The Author concludes by stating that biases lead to “nationalist dogma” saying nations are unitary, monolithic, or autonomous, but cultures include more foreign influences than they exclude. Since this generalization is backed up by the examples the Author brings up throughout the passage, it’s the main point.

Resolving a Debate - The Author brings up two ways to view history - that of certain scholars and nationalists, who take a monolithic view of society; and to see the various influences that every culture has. She sides with the latter, which is reflected in our Generalization, above.

Paradox/Resolution - The Author brings up a paradox in Line 57. This paradox is that all nationally defined cultures (e.g., American) have a tendency to view themselves as monolithic, but we’re more aware than ever that this isn’t the case. This paradox very much lines up with the Resolving a Debate Meta-Structure, and the one side of the paradox lines up with the Author’s view that national cultures are an amalgamation of many influences, so this answer reinforces the prior Meta-Structures while also introducing new language we can see in big picture questions (“paradox,” “unexpected,” and other language that reflects this concept).

Last Thoughts?

The general example/specific example pattern in Paragraphs 2 and 3 are pretty interesting, and it would be important to have a view on both the general and specific in order to find information needed for the questions, so you should have notes for both levels in each relevant paragraph.

Question prompt

The author's use of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Social Science

Strategy Overview

Review the purpose of the paragraph including Line 37, then use that and the immediate context around the relevant word to define its meaning

Answer Anticipation

Line 37 shows up in Paragraph 2, which is where we said the Author is bringing up a general example and specific example focusing on “tradition,” which just so happens to be the key word in this question!Diving into the paragraph to see what that means, Line 37 is included in a sentence that starts in Line 35. That sentence, however, starts with a “Thus,” so it’s building off the previous sentence, where the Author states that the ruling class in Europe felt the need to project their power back through time to give it legitimacy. So Queen Victoria, in that final sentence including Line 37, is an example of the ruling class trying to justify their rule by projecting it back in time.The word in question itself is in quotation marks, which generally conveys one of two things on the LSAT - it’s quoting something else, or it’s being used ironically. Here, there’s nothing to quote, so the use of “traditional” must mean that the Author doesn’t view these jamborees as actually being traditional, but rather fake traditional in order to justify Victoria’s rule. Let’s find an answer reflecting that meaning.

Answer choices

  1. A
    had been revived after Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) There’s no indication in that example that there was a period of time where jamborees weren’t used - just that the English ruling class tried to misappropriate them for their own ends.

  2. B
    were legitimized by their Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) If the Author were arguing that these jamborees worked to legitimize European rule of India, then this answer could be correct. But there’s content and structural reasons to believe that’s not the case. As far as content goes, the Author is arguing about imperial rule that, later on, she states has ended, so it’s unlikely she’d be arguing here that the Indian people accepted Queen Victoria as a legitimate leader based on a long history of rule. As far as structure goes, traditional is thrown in quotes, letting us know the Author doesn’t believe that it actually reflected tradition.

  3. C
    exemplified the dominance of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) To illustrate the dominance of an imperial culture, the Author would likely bring up a European custom that was foisted on the colonized culture, not an Indian custom misappropriated by Europeans.

  4. D
    conferred spurious historical legitimacy Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem

    (D) This answer reflects the content and structure of the passage. The Author argues that the European elite used these jamborees in an attempt to gain historical legitimacy, but she also shows that it didn’t really work. Additionally, she throws traditional in quotes, letting us know she means it ironically - these jamborees didn’t actually serve to convey the feeling of tradition on Victoria’s rule. This answer is therefore correct.

  5. E
    combined historic elements of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) While the European elite were using these jamborees to legitimize their rule, there’s no indication that they included any elements of European culture. It seems they took an Indian tradition and tried to coopt it.

What this tests

Discussion