PrepTest 124

Incorrect. While this answer discusses a time period outside of 1750—1765 (early 18th century would be the first half of the 1700s), it brings up something that would have continued through the time period in question—the technological revolution that started earlier in the century. As such, since this answer can provide an explanation for how trade doubled in the first part of the latter half of the 18th century, it's incorrect.

Incorrect. This answer falls into the specified time period and provides an explanation for increased trade then, so it's incorrect.

Incorrect. This answer ties into the opening of banks, which first happened in 1750, so it matches the timeline. And it explains why trade could increase (more efficient financial transactions make trade easier), so it's incorrect.

Incorrect. This answer brings up a change during the relevant time period that would have a positive impact on trade, thus explaining the phenomenon. It can be ruled out.

Correct. Argument or Facts:
Facts

Question Type:
Bizarro Paradox

Stimulus Summary:
Trade in Glasgow doubled between 1750 (first bank opens) and 1765 (first bank regulations implemented).

Answer Anticipation:
This Paradox question is interesting in that it doesn't really present a paradox—more a phenomenon that needs an explanation. Between 1750 and 1765, trade doubled in Glasgow. This coincided with the opening of the first bank.

There is a key element here that we can anticipate will be related to the answers—the timeline. When a timeline is presented on an LSAT question, it's usually a key part of the logic. Therefore, anything that explains a doubling of trade in that time period—related or unrelated to the opening of the bank—will be incorrect in this Bizarro Paradox question. And any answer that is tied to regulations or talks about a time period after 1765 will be correct, since it doesn't explain what happened in the years between 1750 and 1765. (Note that something happening before that time period could provide an explanation, though it would need to be something that would continue through that time period.)

Answer Explanation:
The initial regulations happened in 1765, so they can't explain the doubling of trade before that time period. This answer is correct in this Bizarro Paradox question.

Key Takeaway:
Note timelines when they're brought up in a stimulus! They're often key to understanding the logic or quickly working through answers.