PrepTest 119
[lcid:3573] Prep Test 119 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S2
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Philosopher: Effective tests have
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Facts
Valid or Flawed
NA
Question Type
Illustration Questions
Stimulus Summary
Genetic tests can, for the first time, let people know whether they have a disease. But some can’t be treated, and knowing they have a fatal, incurable disease is stressful. So should we test people?
Answer Anticipation
This stimulus doesn’t feature an argument as much as a scenario that leads to a specific question, which the author raises in the last statement.
The scenario brings up a new technology that makes something possible - diagnosing diseases that are fatal and incurable. It’s noted that knowing you have one can be stressful - so knowing you have this disease has a downside. From there, it asks whether this technology should be made available - the key word there being should. Asking that is asking for some type of judgment to be made.
The correct answer should reflect these details.
Answer choices
-
AThe advance of medicine Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
The problem here is an incurable disease. However, the Philosopher notes that medicine can’t “yet” prevent such conditions, suggesting that it’s possible they will be cured. Thus, we can’t say that this stimulus shows that advances in medicine can’t solve certain problems. -
BThe advance of medicine Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
This answer reflects the details of the scenario in the stimulus. A medical advancement - genetic testing - has created a new ability/context where a question of what “should” be done is raised. Asking, “Should we?” is an ethical dilemma, so this answer is illustrated by the stimulus. -
CMedical technologies continue to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
This answer ignores everything after the first two sentences, reflecting mostly the background from the stimulus. -
DThe more we come Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
The question raised is of whether the downsides of a technology outweigh the upsides; there’s no reflection on how little we know. -
EThe advance of technology Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
This answer is a little too broad to be supported by a stimulus about one example of medical technology. Also, the value of the technology itself isn’t in question - it’s whether the information gained from it should be made available.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Why D is correct? 2 replies
Started by frederickliu
-
Question #4 1 reply
Started by ivyandroses27