Diagram Pls.
Started by
Selina
· started 2015-03-04 19:19
· last activity 2020-04-22 00:56
· 6 replies
I did get the correct answer however I had trouble with the diagram.
-
Naz
· 2015-03-17 00:29
Let's diagram:
"Most serious students are happy students."
Q1: SS-most-HS
HS-some-SS
"most serious students go to graduate school."
Q2: SS-most-GS
GS-some-SS
"Furthermore, all students who go to graduate school are overworked."
P1: GS ==> OW
not OW ==> not GS
So, we know that we cannot combine a "most" statement with a "some" statement. And we can only combine a Sufficient & Necessary statement with a Quantifier statement if the sufficient condition of the Sufficient & Necessary statement and the right-hand-side variable of the Quantifier statement are the same.
Therefore, we can combine "Q2" and "P1," like so: SS-most-GS ==> OW to conclude: SS-most-OW, i.e. most serious students are overworked. However, as you can see, none of the answer choices give us: "SS-most-OW."
Well, what else can we combine? We know that we can combine two "most" statements if their left-hand-side variables are the same into a "some" statement with their respective right-hand-side variables. So, we can combine "Q1: SS-most-HS" with the new inference: "SS-most-OW," to conclude: "HS-some-OW," i.e. some happy students are overworked, which is answer choice (B): "Some happy students are overworked."
Hope that clears things up! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
-
yababio
· 2015-05-21 15:14
Theres no video
-
Naz
· 2015-05-21 21:45
There is no need for a video explanation to this question since it has no major visual components. Please refer to the written explanation above for a breakdown of the problem.
Hope that helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
-
brenthorn
· 2017-07-24 02:37
Could we have combined Q1 and Q2 straight off the bat, since they are both most and both have SS on the left to state that HS -some-GS, therefore HS -some -GS ==>OW; HS-some-OW?
-
Mehran
· 2017-07-28 17:51
@brenthorn absolutely!
P: SS-most-HS
P: SS-most-GS
C; HS-some-GS
GS-some-HS
Unfortunately, this was not an answer choice but it is definitely a valid deduction.
Notice, however, that this deduction is then combined with the S & N statement to arrive at the correct answer choice here:
HS-some-GS ==> OW
HS-some-OW
This is exactly what (B) says, i.e. "Some happy students are overworked."
Hope that helps! Keep up the great work!
-
:))
· 2020-04-22 00:56
How does SS-most-HS and SS-most-OW combined make "some"? Why can't it still be "SS-most-HS" SS-most-OW" = "HS-most-OW"?
Sign in to reply.